I would assume we would discuss it as we are now. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Giovanni P <fiat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I declare myself offended (for no reason, because there is absolutely no > reason to be offended by the present logo) by the next logo you come up > with, will you change it? > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Bryan Green <dbryan.gr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > It may not offend you, but apparently it offends some people. This is > a > > > bad thing for a logo. I think this is why it is rare for the human > > figure > > > to be common in most logos. Most keep logos very simple. > > > > There are 7 billion people on Earth - you'll never fit them all. > > Let's move away from abstract angry offended people to concrete ones > > with their own arguments why they thought that logo hits them and > > discuss their problem personally. Anyone around? Joan? > > Otherwise this is counterproductive discussion about edge cases which > > will never happens. > > > > -- > > ,,,^..^,,, > > >
