Can you recommend an ideal erlang version to use? I'm not using https.
Nick On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Nick Wood <[email protected]> wrote: > > I updated both servers to use this container image - > > https://hub.docker.com/r/klaemo/couchdb/~/dockerfile/ which is what I > > believe the CouchDB team is trying to base it's official docker image off > > of. > > That's true. > > > When I cycle through all ~1100 of our databases and do a non-continuous > > replication, I don't receive a single error or crash. I continuously > queue > > 20 of them into the _replicator database and I can see it processing > about > > 2 per second. (on a side note, any idea why it only does 2-3 per second > > when I can see plenty of available disk, ram and cpu? Seems like there's > an > > internal hard-code delay maybe?) > > There are no any hardcoded delays of such kind. > > No ideas, except some docker-specific issues or constraints. I would > try to remove docker, do plain install and ensure that there are no > any issues with you setup, and then try to dig into what other people > reports about their docker apps under load and which issues they > faced. Finally, debug your container to see what causes delays. That's > the list I would follow in same situation. > > > Might I still have a broken version of erlang? It looks like the version > I > > ended up with using that docker image is 17.3. > > Erlang 17.3 is broken indeed, you should avoid this release. > Especially, if you use https. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, >
