Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I figured out that there was some mistake from my
side. In one of the configuration I forgot to include the relation
extractor engine, so it was giving the different output. Also it was
recognizing "cm" (centimeter, for e.g. in text "0.3 cm")  both as disease
and measurement. I explored a bit and found out that "cm" in UMLS is an
abreviation for "Cutaneous Mastocytosis", which is a disease.

Thanks,
Ashutosh


On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Pei Chen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ashutosh,
> That is strange.  If it's the same pipeline, the results should be the
> same.  Have you tried the CPE with only 1 doc?  Could it be related to
> the threading issues with the LVG component?
> --Pei
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ashutosh Modi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running ctakes in two different ways, one using CAS visual debugger
> > (CVD) and other using Collection Processing Engine (CPE). For the same
> text
> > I am getting different results from both the modes. I am using the same
> > engines in the both the modes. The results from CVD seem more plausible
> (and
> > correct) and output of CPE has more errors. Am I am missing something?
> How
> > can correct this?
> >
> > Please help me with this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ashutosh
>

Reply via email to