I think that's generally safe, but I'd be nervous about time based assumptions like that. In the recipes I write I always err on the side of caution.
-JZ On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > My thinking was that for cases like a standard Mutex lock that can only be > held by a single client at a time, it can assume that it still holds the lock > after it sees a SUSPEND event until 2/3 of the session timeout has expired > and it hasn't reconnected.
