Hi, I have created this content, hope this will help people to develop new function:
http://tgrall.github.io/blog/2015/07/21/apache-drill-how-to-create-a-new-function/ Regards Tug @tgrall On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > No apologies needed. We welcome constructive criticism. I just wanted to > put it in context for the rest of the readers of this list. > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Andrew Brust < > andrew.br...@bluebadgeinsights.com> wrote: > > > Yes, agreed. Fair point and apologies for not articulating same in my > > comment. > > > > > > > > > > On 7/20/15, 4:10 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Andrew Brust < > > >andrew.br...@bluebadgeinsights.com> wrote: > > > > > >> 1. It seems to me like Drill is at a point where, if you thread the > > needle > > >> perfectly, things generally work as advertised. That’s certainly an > > >> advance over the old, old days, where stuff that should have worked > > >> sometimes just didn’t. > > >> 2. Threading that needle can be super-hard, even for an experienced > Java > > >> developer. > > >> > > > > > >This is definitely true for the problem of *extending* Drill. > > > > > >It is much less of a problem for *using* Drill, which is what the team > has > > >spent much more effort on. See the Drill in 10 minutes article in the > > docs. > > > > > >To my mind, this prioritization is correct. But it shouldn't be > exclusive > > >either. > > > > > >This is not to say that user-level fit and finish is done by any means, > > >just that people who extend the system will get lots more splinters. > > >
