In addition to the auto partitioning done by CTAS, Drill also supports
directory based pruning. You could load data into different(nested)
directories underneath the top level table location and use the 'where'
clause to get the pruning performance benefits. Following is a typical
example
Table location: /home/user/table_name
Within this you could create nested directory structure of the form
/home/user/table_name/2010/jan
/home/user/table_name/2010/feb
...
/home/user/table_name/2010/dec
/home/user/table_name/2011/jan
...
/home/user/table_name/2011/dec
Given this directory structure you could have a query that looks like
select col1 from dfs.`/home/user/table_name` where dir0 = 2011 and dir1
= jan;
This would prune out scanning the parquet files under the other
directories.
Thanks
Mehant
On 10/21/15 11:26 AM, Chris Mathews wrote:
We have an existing ETL framework processing machine generated data, which we
are updating to write Parquet files out directly to HDFS using
AvroParquetWriter for access by Drill.
Some questions:
How do we take advantage of Drill’s partition pruning capabilities with
PARTITION BY if we are not using CTAS to load the Parquet files ?
It seems there is no way of taking advantage of these features if the Parquet
files are created externally to CTAS - am I correct ?
If I am, then is there any way using a Drill API of programatically loading our
data into Parquet files and utilise Drill's parallelisation techniques using
CTAS, or do we have to write the data out to a file and then load that file
again as input to a CTAS command ?
Another potential issue is that we are constantly writing Parquet files out to
HDFS directories so the data in these files eventually appears as additional
data in a Drill query - so how can we do this with CTAS ? Does CTAS append to
an existing directory structure or does it insist on a new table name each time
it is executed ?
What I am getting at here is that there seem to be performance enhancement
features available to Drill when the Parquet files are created using an
existing file as input to a CTAS that are not possible otherwise. With the
volumes of data we are talking about it is not really an option to write the
files out, form them to then be read back in again for conversion using CTAS;
which is why we write the Parquet files out directly to HDFS and append them to
existing directories.
Am I missing something obvious here - quite possibly yes ?
Thanks for any help.
Cheers — Chris
