Hi, Having adds to the trouble and claims that the field needs to be grouped and then fails the same way if it's added to group by.
I ended up wrapping this in a "with <> as ()" but that is far from ideal. Regards, -Stefán On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Bob Rumsby <brum...@maprtech.com> wrote: > Try using the HAVING clause. The WHERE clause cannot constrain the results > of aggregate functions. > http://drill.apache.org/docs/having-clause/ > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Stefán Baxter <ste...@activitystream.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm using parquet+drill and the following statement works just fine: > > > > select sold_to, count(*) as trans_count from > > dfs.asa.`/processed/venuepoint/transactions` where group by sold_to; > > > > When addin this where clause nothing is returned: > > > > select sold_to, count(*) as trans_count from dfs.asa.`/transactions` > where > > trans_count > 70 group by sold_to; > > > > > > Is this a known limitation or a bug? > > > > Regards, > > -Stefán > > >
