Experimental plugins: I strongly believe in the open architecture offered by Drill, and I would welcome a plugin dictionary separated from core Apache Drill where "experimental" and / or even commercial plugins could be shared. (similar to how Spark is dealing with packages) I believe experimental plugins to be central to drive adoption and new features, but I am not sure if they need to be controlled the same way as the core or by the same developers. As a hobby plugin developer it is a tad bit frustrating to not be able to share work and by that find interested participants to bring a new features into the Apache Drill community. Does anyone else have a view on this?
Regards, Magnus
