pull requests are fine. You still need a JIRA though

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Johannes Schulte <[email protected]
> wrote:

> I now extended the AvroFormatTest-Suite by two unit tests that show that
>
> * Flattening of primitive array works as expected
> * Flattening of arrays of records does not work properly
>
> I spent some time trying to find the reason but it's my first contact with
> the drill-codebase.
>
> Is the recommended way of making this unit test available still to attach a
> patch in an issue or is a pull-request also an option?
>
> In the context of the recent avro maturity discussion I would love to fix
> this error myself but I would need some hints what goes wrong there
> internally.
>
> Johannes
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Johannes Schulte <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stefan, hi Jacques, thanks for going after this - I almost resignated
> > but know i think it was because i accessed the data over jdbc with
> squirrel
> > and got irritated by the unknown type column there. nonetheless, if the
> > schema looks like this:
> >
> >
> > {
> >   "type" : "record",
> >   "name" : "MainRecord",
> >   "namespace" : "drizz.WriteAvroTestFileForDrill$",
> >   "fields" : [ {
> >     "name" : "elements",
> >     "type" : {
> >       "type" : "array",
> >       "items" : {
> >         "type" : "record",
> >         "name" : "NestedRecord",
> >         "fields" : [ {
> >           "name" : "field1",
> >           "type" : "int"
> >         } ]
> >       },
> >       "java-class" : "java.util.List"
> >     }
> >   } ]
> > }
> >
> > and the contents looks like this (according to avro tojson command line
> > utility)
> >
> >
> >
> {"elements":[{"field1":0},{"field1":1},{"field1":2},{"field1":3},{"field1":4},{"field1":5},{"field1":6},{"field1":7},{"field1":8},{"field1":9}]}
> >
> >
> {"elements":[{"field1":0},{"field1":1},{"field1":2},{"field1":3},{"field1":4},{"field1":5},{"field1":6},{"field1":7},{"field1":8},{"field1":9}]}
> >
> > a query like
> >
> > select flatten(elements) from
> > dfs.`/Users/j.schulte/data/avro-drill/no-union/`;
> >
> > yields exactly two rows:
> > +---------------+
> > |    EXPR$0     |
> > +---------------+
> > | {"field1":9}  |
> > | {"field1":9}  |
> > +---------------+
> >
> > as if only the last element in the array would survive.
> >
> > Thanks for your help so far..
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Stefán Baxter <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Johannes, Jacques is right.
> >>
> >> I only tested the flattening of maps and not the flattening of
> >> list-of-maps.
> >>
> >> -Stefan
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think there is some incorrect information and confusion in this
> >> thread.
> >> > Could you please share a piece of sample data and a specific query?
> The
> >> > error message shown in your original email is suggesting that you were
> >> > trying to flatten a map rather than an array of maps. Flatten is for
> >> arrays
> >> > only. The arrays can have scalars or complex objects in them.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jacques Nadeau
> >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Johannes Schulte <
> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Stefan,
> >> > >
> >> > > thanks for this information - so it seems that there is currently no
> >> way
> >> > of
> >> > > accessing nested rich objects with drill; I somehow got that wrong
> >> from
> >> > the
> >> > > documentation...
> >> > >
> >> > > Cheers,
> >> > > Johannes
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Stefán Baxter <
> >> > [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > FYI: flattening of embedded structures is not supported in Parquet
> >> > > either.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards,
> >> > > >  -Stefan
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Johannes Schulte <
> >> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Stefan,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > thanks for your response and the link to your udf repository,
> >> it's a
> >> > > good
> >> > > > > reference. I tried drill 1.6, the data is an array of complex
> >> objects
> >> > > > > though. I will try to setup a drill dev environment and see if i
> >> can
> >> > > > modify
> >> > > > > the tests to fail.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Johannes
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Stefán Baxter <
> >> > > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > FYI. this seems to be working in 1.6, at least on the Avro
> data
> >> > that
> >> > > we
> >> > > > > > have.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Stefán Baxter <
> >> > > > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi again,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > What version of Drill are you using?
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > > > - Stefán
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Stefán Baxter <
> >> > > > > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> Hi Johannes,
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> As great as Drill is the Avro plugin has been a source of
> >> > > > frustration
> >> > > > > > for
> >> > > > > > >> us @activitystream.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> We have a small UDF library [1] (apache licensed) which
> >> > contains a
> >> > > > > > >> function can return an array (List<String>) from Avro as a
> >> CSV
> >> > > list.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> You could use that to roll your own or provide me with a
> >> small
> >> > > > sample
> >> > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > >> I can create a custom flatten function for you.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> The best would be to wait for a fix but this can
> potentially
> >> get
> >> > > you
> >> > > > > out
> >> > > > > > >> of a rough spot.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/activitystream/asdrill
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Regards,
> >> > > > > > >>  -Stefán
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Johannes Schulte <
> >> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> when trying to read simple avro arrays with select
> >> > flatten(array)
> >> > > > > from
> >> > > > > > >>> dfs... i get the exception
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> SQL Query Error: SYSTEM ERROR: ClassCastException: Cannot
> >> cast
> >> > > > > > >>> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.MapVector to
> >> > > > > > >>> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.RepeatedValueVector
> >> > > > > > >>> ^
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> The type of the array is said to be <UnknownType (2,002)>
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Is this the expected behaviour? The documentation mostly
> >> talsk
> >> > > > about
> >> > > > > > json
> >> > > > > > >>> and parquet complex types and i wonder if the avro storage
> >> > plugin
> >> > > > > > behaves
> >> > > > > > >>> differently.
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Thanks,
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Johannes
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 

Abdelhakim Deneche

Software Engineer

  <http://www.mapr.com/>


Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training
<http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available>

Reply via email to