Hi Team,

Did default value for configuration parameter 'planner.width.max_per_node' 
change between Drill 1.10 and 1.11 versions? Also, does default value of 70% of 
total cores still hold true?



-- Drill 1.11


0: jdbc:drill:drillbit=localhost> select * from sys.options where name like 
'%planner.width%';
+------------------------------+-------+-------------------+--------------+----------+----------+-------------+-----------+------------+
|             name             | kind  | accessibleScopes  | optionScope  |  
status  | num_val  | string_val  | bool_val  | float_val  |
+------------------------------+-------+-------------------+--------------+----------+----------+-------------+-----------+------------+
| planner.width.max_per_node   | LONG  | ALL               | BOOT         | 
DEFAULT  | 0        | null        | null      | null       |
| planner.width.max_per_query  | LONG  | ALL               | BOOT         | 
DEFAULT  | 1000     | null        | null      | null       |
+------------------------------+-------+-------------------+--------------+----------+----------+-------------+-----------+------------+
2 rows selected (0.913 seconds)
0: jdbc:drill:drillbit=localhost>

-Drill 1.10

0: jdbc:drill:schema=dfs> select * from sys.options where name like 
'%planner.width%';
+------------------------------+-------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+-----------+------------+
|             name             | kind  |  type   |  status  | num_val  | 
string_val  | bool_val  | float_val  |
+------------------------------+-------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+-----------+------------+
| planner.width.max_per_node   | LONG  | SYSTEM  | DEFAULT  | 3        | null   
     | null      | null       |
| planner.width.max_per_query  | LONG  | SYSTEM  | DEFAULT  | 1000     | null   
     | null      | null       |
+------------------------------+-------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+-----------+------------+
2 rows selected (0.359 seconds)
0: jdbc:drill:schema=dfs>

Thanks,

Arjun

Reply via email to