I also meet this problem when querying apache2 log in different machines.
How I can test this feature?

Abhishek Girish <[email protected]> 于2018年8月17日周五 上午2:47写道:

> I'd also like to add that with the DFS storage plugin configured with local
> file system, one will have to make sure all nodes with Drillbits have the
> same files (under the same directory structure). If a given query on a
> dataset spawns a distributed plan (multiple fragments), then it may fail if
> one of the fragments on a remote Drillbit cannot find the file being
> referenced by the foreman. Also, this is not something that's been well
> tried out and documented, so there may be some surprises.
>
> -Abhishek
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 9:44 AM Vitalii Diravka <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mehran,
> >
> > This is a question for user mailing list.
> >
> > Looks like there are no issues with it, you can run Drill in distributed
> > mode on Windows, Linux or MacOS based machines.
> > It necessary to specify *zk.connect* for Zookeeper hostname and port
> number
> > in *drill-override.conf* file and to run *>bin/drillbit.sh start *[1].
> > But a Hadoop cluster is recommended for this purpose [2], therefore not
> > sure which issues can arise with this system.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://drill.apache.org/docs/starting-drill-in-distributed-mode/#drillbit.sh-command-syntax
> > [2] https://drill.apache.org/docs/distributed-mode-prerequisites/
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Vitalii
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 7:11 PM Mehran Dashti [ BR - PD ] <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I wanted to know if it is possible or possible by minimal effort to
> have
> > > distributed drills that work on local file system of their own?
> > >
> > > We  do not want to have HDFS as file system?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you in advance.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Best Regards,*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *      [image: LOGO1]*
> > >
> > > *Mehran Dashti*
> > >
> > > *Product Leader*
> > >
> > > *09125902452*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to