it shouldn't have been from 2.5, but it is being removed from 3.0
On 3/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have parent drl file with: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <!DOCTYPE rule-set [ > <!ENTITY rules-rulefile1 SYSTEM "rulefile1.drl" > > <!ENTITY rules-rulefile2 SYSTEM "rulefile2.drl" > > ]> > <rule-set name="RuleSet1" > xmlns="http://drools.org/rules"; > > xmlns:java="http://drools.org/semantics/java"; > > xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > xs:schemaLocation="http://drools.org/rules > rules.xsd > > http://drools.org/semantics/java java.xsd"> > > &rules-rulefile1; > &rules-rulefile2; > > </rule-set> > > rulefile1.drl and rulefile2.drl have simply rules > defined. > And both rulefile1.drl and rulefile2.drl - I use them > in several other parent > rule files. > > Because of that, to avoid having to add > <java:import>... in each parent file, > I use the "import xxx.yy" in the <java:consequence>. > This has been working fine for all previous releases > of drools - until > I got the Drools 2.5. With that, it gives compile > error for the import that is within > the consequence - Has the support been removed for > import within consequence? > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
