please note that:

  s : String()
 eval (s.startsWith("Hello"))
 or eval(s.startsWith("Hi"))

is not right, as the stuff in "eval(.... )" is java semantics.

also,  eval (s.startsWith("Hello")
       || s.startsWith("Hi"))
is better as
eval(s.startsWith("Hello")) or eval(s.startsWith("Hi"))

On 3/31/06, Yuesong Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> Thanks, I'll be looking forward to the new build. The
> other problem that I ran into is with the use of line
> breaks.
>
> This works:
>
>   s : String()
>   eval (s.startsWith("Hello") || s.startsWith("Hi"))
>
>   * drools gives an error message, but it doesn't seem
> to effect anything.
>
> This doesn't work:
>
>   s : String()
>   eval (s.startsWith("Hello")
>         || s.startsWith("Hi"))
>
> This is mainly for being able to format the rules
> nicely. The expression can easiely get over 80
> characters.
>
> I also tried this with no luck
>
>   s : String()
>   eval (s.startsWith("Hello"))
>   or eval(s.startsWith("Hi"))
>
> There's a similar issue in jira, but I am not sure
> they are exactly the same, so decided to post it here.
>
> --- Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > yeah someone brought that up earlier - thank god for
> > end user testing :)
> > Its not an easy one to fix. It may not make it in
> > for the RC release -
> > we'll try our best. It will certainly be fixed
> > before end of next week.
> >
> > Mark
> > Yuesong Wang wrote:
> > > 3.0 beta 3 doesn't seem to allow null as a
> > constraint.
> > >
> > > If I do
> > >
> > > Cheese (type == null)
> > >
> > > It complains that null is not a declaration.
> > >
> > > Is that right?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Yuesong
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Reply via email to