Definitely +1!

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:58 PM Amir Ghaemi <agha...@umd.edu> wrote:

> +1
>
> Best Regards,
> *Amir M. Ghaemi*
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:06 AM Gedd Johnson <uncleg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best,
> > Gedd Johnson
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 23:22 Joshua Poore <poor...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Emphatic +1 for me.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Josh
> > >
> > >
> > > On Oct 31, 2022, at 5:13 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <lewi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:31 Austin Bennett <aus...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Flagon Community,
> > >> +1
> > >> Given recent discussions around the graduation status of the project,
> it
> > >> is time to work through the process.  We have had a recent discussion
> > >> on-list, and consensus seems to be in favor of graduation.  The next
> > step
> > >> seems to be a recommendation that we make an official VOTE, per:
> > >> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation
> > >> .html#community_graduation_vote
> > >>
> > >> *Please VOTE* for the actual record.  I will also let the Incubator
> know
> > >> the vote is occurring [ per the link above ], and imagine that I will
> > tally
> > >> the votes later on Friday the 4th to allow for >= 72 hours; we'll see
> > how
> > >> this thread goes.
> > >>
> > >> Per https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html* ideally votes will
> > >> be +1, 0, or -1* And, as I understand it, only IPMC votes are binding,
> > >> as found in https://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Please consider this my +1.
> > >>
> > >> The existing community has demonstrated addressing the requirements as
> > >> found in the incubator guidelines for graduation.  Graduation is an
> > >> important milestone signaling project maturity, and a great step
> towards
> > >> ongoing growth and evolution.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers -
> > >> Austin
> > >>
> > >> --
> > > http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to