Hi Anwar!

0.10.0 was feature frozen at that time already and under testing. Key/value
state on connected streams will have to go into the next release...

Stephan


On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Anwar Rizal <anriza...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Stephan,
>
> Having a look at the brand new 0.10 release, I noticed that OperatorState
> is not implemented for ConnectedStream, which is quite the opposite of what
> you said below.
>
> Or maybe I misunderstood your sentence here ?
>
> Thanks,
> Anwar.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> In general, if you can keep state in Flink, you get better
>> throughput/latency/consistency and have one less system to worry about
>> (external k/v store). State outside means that the Flink processes can be
>> slimmer and need fewer resources and as such recover a bit faster. There
>> are use cases for that as well.
>>
>> Storing the model in OperatorState is a good idea, if you can. On the
>> roadmap is to migrate the operator state to managed memory as well, so that
>> should take care of the GC issues.
>>
>> We are just adding functionality to make the Key/Value operator state
>> usable in CoMap/CoFlatMap as well (currently it only works in windows and
>> in Map/FlatMap/Filter functions over the KeyedStream).
>> Until the, you should be able to use a simple Java HashMap and use the
>> "Checkpointed" interface to get it persistent.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Welly Tambunan <if05...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the answer.
>>>
>>> Currently the approach that i'm using right now is creating a
>>> base/marker interface to stream different type of message to the same
>>> operator. Not sure about the performance hit about this compare to the
>>> CoFlatMap function.
>>>
>>> Basically this one is providing query cache, so i'm thinking instead of
>>> using in memory cache like redis, ignite etc, i can just use operator state
>>> for this one.
>>>
>>> I just want to gauge do i need to use memory cache or operator state
>>> would be just fine.
>>>
>>> However i'm concern about the Gen 2 Garbage Collection for caching our
>>> own state without using operator state. Is there any clarification on that
>>> one ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Anwar Rizal <anriza...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Let me understand your case better here. You have a stream of model and
>>>> stream of data. To process the data, you will need a way to access your
>>>> model from the subsequent stream operations (map, filter, flatmap, ..).
>>>> I'm not sure in which case Operator State is a good choice, but I think
>>>> you can also live without.
>>>>
>>>> val modelStream = .... // get the model stream
>>>> val dataStream   =
>>>>
>>>> modelStream.broadcast.connect(dataStream). coFlatMap(  ) Then you can
>>>> keep the latest model in a CoFlatMapRichFunction, not necessarily as
>>>> Operator State, although maybe OperatorState is a good choice too.
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense to you ?
>>>>
>>>> Anwar
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Welly Tambunan <if05...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have a high density data that required a downsample. However this
>>>>> downsample model is very flexible based on the client device and user
>>>>> interaction. So it will be wasteful to precompute and store to db.
>>>>>
>>>>> So we want to use Apache Flink to do downsampling and cache the result
>>>>> for subsequent query.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are considering using Flink Operator state for that one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that the right approach to use that for memory cache ? Or if that
>>>>> preferable using memory cache like redis etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comments will be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> Welly Tambunan
>>>>> Triplelands
>>>>>
>>>>> http://weltam.wordpress.com
>>>>> http://www.triplelands.com <http://www.triplelands.com/blog/>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Welly Tambunan
>>> Triplelands
>>>
>>> http://weltam.wordpress.com
>>> http://www.triplelands.com <http://www.triplelands.com/blog/>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to