Hi Shikhar,

I just wanted to let you know that we've found the problem with the failing
assembly plugin. It was caused by incompatible classes [1, 2]. Once these
PRs are merged, the merge problems should be resolved.

By the way, we've also added now a SBT template for Flink projects using
giter8 which you might wanna check out [3, 4]. This will set up a proper
sbt project structure.

[1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1681
[2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1682
[3] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1688
[4] https://github.com/tillrohrmann/flink-project.g8

Cheers,
Till

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I know that Till is currently looking into making the SBT experience
> better. He should have an update in a bit.
>
> We need to check a few corner cases about how SBT and Maven dependencies
> and types (provided, etc) interact and come up with a plan.
>
> We'll also add an SBT quickstart to the homepage as a result of this, to
> help making this easier.
>
> Greetings,
> Stephan
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:41 PM, shikhar <shik...@schmizz.net> wrote:
>
>> Stephan Ewen wrote
>> > Do you know why you are getting conflicts on the FashHashMap class, even
>> > though the core Flink dependencies are "provided"? Does adding the Kafka
>> > connector pull in all the core Flink dependencies?
>>
>> Yes, the core Flink dependencies are being pulled in transitively from the
>> Kafka connector.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flink-packaging-makes-life-hard-for-SBT-fat-jar-s-tp4897p4924.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list
>> archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to