Hi Denis! For windows, it should not matter if you pick a Hadoop 1 or Hadoop 2 flavor.
Stephan On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:36 PM, <denis.doll...@thomsonreuters.com> wrote: > Ok, thanks for the link. > > > > This makes sense. > > > > I don’t know why I had in mind that running Flink on Windows implied using > the hadoop1 flavor of Flink – that’s very likely unrelated, please correct > me if I’m wrong. > > > > Regards, > > Denis > > > > *From:* Greg Hogan [mailto:c...@greghogan.com] > *Sent:* lundi 23 janvier 2017 17:18 > > *To:* user@flink.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Release 1.2? > > > > Support for Hadoop 1 was dropped in FLINK-4895 [1]. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4895 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_FLINK-2D4895&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=Jtkfol_Mg_eQUL17wcicdBE1Et94D7zgzS-8_bKvGlc&m=F2D9Hys_0Zx-K8EXiY5hsfFlkSfIKul6-c714VJtXrw&s=0oJE_eMENDUuuMwQVx5nAc95vn75pYDncAp0LRJzEUA&e=> > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:09 AM, <denis.doll...@thomsonreuters.com> > wrote: > > I notice that for Flink 1.2.0 there is no x.y.z-hadoop1 folder (Cf. Apache > staging > repo > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__repository.apache.org_content_repositories_staging_org_apache_flink_flink-2Djava_&d=CwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=Jtkfol_Mg_eQUL17wcicdBE1Et94D7zgzS-8_bKvGlc&m=F2D9Hys_0Zx-K8EXiY5hsfFlkSfIKul6-c714VJtXrw&s=KRxcXYbzhUKj3BLue9YHTqB5dWX8D7RRPJ7bUFivID8&e=>). > This is very useful to me for developing on Windows. > > > > Is it temporary, for 1.2 RCs only? > > > > Regards, > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > *From:* Dollfus, Denis (TR Technology & Ops) > *Sent:* mardi 17 janvier 2017 18:35 > *To:* user@flink.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: Release 1.2? > > > > Thanks for the quick update, sounds perfect! > > And I‘ll try the staging repo trick in pom.xml. > > > > Denis > > > > *From:* Stephan Ewen [mailto:se...@apache.org <se...@apache.org>] > *Sent:* mardi 17 janvier 2017 11:42 > *To:* user@flink.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Release 1.2? > > > > So far it looks as if the next release candidate comes in a few days (end > of this week, beginning of next). > > > > Keep the fingers crossed that it passes! > > > > If you want to help speed the release up, I would recommend to check the > next release candidate (simply use it as the deployed version and see if it > works for you). > > You can use release candidates like regular releases, if you add the > apache staging repository to the sources in you application's pom.xml file. > > > > The email announcing the release candidate usually has the details for > that, > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Denis, > > the first 1.2 RC0 has already been released and the RC1 is on the way > (maybe already this week). I think that we can expect a 1.2 release in 3-4 > weeks. > > Regards, > Timo > > > Am 17/01/17 um 10:04 schrieb denis.doll...@thomsonreuters.com: > > Hi all, > > > > Do you have some ballpark estimate for a stable release of Flink 1.2? > > We are still at a proof-of-concept stage and are interested in several > features of 1.2, notably async stream operations (FLINK-4391). > > > > Thank you, > > > > Denis > > > ------------------------------ > > > This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains > information that may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not an > intended recipient, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete > this e-mail and any attachments. Certain required legal entity disclosures > can be accessed on our website. > <http://site.thomsonreuters.com/site/disclosures/> > > > > > > >
