Do you have a small example or a link to a doc that has one ?


      From: Chesnay Schepler <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:16 AM
 Subject: Re: Key by Task number
   
 If the number of combinations between partition and schemaID is limited then 
the subtask index could actually improve the distribution of values.
 
 In any case, the easiest way to do this is to add a RichMapFunction after the 
flatMap, or modify the flatMap, to also include the subtask index.
 Typically this would be done by creating a Tuple2 containing the index and 
value.
 
 On 18.04.2017 15:43, Kamil Dziublinski wrote:
  
 I am not sure if you really need a keyby, your load will be distributed among 
your map function without it.  But could you explain a bit what is your sink 
doing? 
  
  As for setting parallelism on the consumer remember that you wont have higher 
parallelism than number of partitions in your topic. If you have 240 partitions 
that's fine, but if you have less than other subtasks will be idle. Only one 
task can read from one partition in parallel.  
  On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:38 PM Telco Phone <[email protected]> wrote:
  
   
  I am trying to use the task number as a keyby value to help fan out the work 
load reading from kafka. 
  
  Given: 
          DataStream<SchemaRecord> stream =                 env.addSource(new 
FlinkKafkaConsumer010<SchemaRecord>("topicA", schema, properties)               
  ).setParallelism(240).flatMap(new SchemaRecordSplit()).setParallelism(240).   
                      name("TopicA splitter").keyBy("partition", "keyByHelper", 
"schemaId"); 
          stream.addSink(new CustomMaprFsSink()).name("TopicA 
Sink").setParallelism(240); 
  
  In the DeserialClass I am trying to get to the  
  getRuntimeContext().getIndexOfThisSubtask(); 
  
  Which is only avaliable in the RichSinkFunction 
  
  
  The above is partition (by hour) , schemaID (avro schemaId) and I would like 
to add the task number so that all 240 readers / writers have something to do. 
  Any ideas ? 
  
  
    
  
 
  

   

Reply via email to