Hi, We have been testing with the FsStateBackend for the last few days and have not encountered this issue anymore.
However, we will evaluate the rocksdb backend again soon because we want incremental checkpoint. I will report back if I have more updates. Best regards, Kien On Jul 15, 2017, 00:43, at 00:43, "Gyula Fóra" <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >It will work if you assign a new uid to the Kafka source. > >Gyula > >On Fri, Jul 14, 2017, 18:42 Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> >wrote: > >> One thing: do note that `FlinkKafkaConsumer#setStartFromLatest()` >does not >> have any effect when starting from savepoints. >> i.e., the consumer will still start from whatever offset is written >in the >> savepoint. >> >> >> On 15 July 2017 at 12:38:10 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai >(tzuli...@apache.org) >> wrote: >> >> Can you try starting from the savepoint, but telling Kafka to start >from >> the latest offset? >> >> >> (@gordon: Is that possible in Flink 1.3.1 or only in 1.4-SNAPSHOT ?) >> >> This is already possible in Flink 1.3.x. >> `FlinkKafkaConsumer#setStartFromLatest()` would be it. >> >> On 15 July 2017 at 12:33:53 AM, Stephan Ewen (se...@apache.org) >wrote: >> >> Can you try starting from the savepoint, but telling Kafka to start >from >> the latest offset? >> >> (@gordon: Is that possible in Flink 1.3.1 or only in 1.4-SNAPSHOT ?) >> >> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Kien Truong ><duckientru...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Sorry for the version typo, I'm running 1.3.1. I did not test with >1.2.x. >>> >>> The jobs runs fine with almost 0 back-pressure if it's started from >>> scratch or if I reuse the kafka consumers group id without >specifying the >>> safe point. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Kien >>> On Jul 14, 2017, at 15:59, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Flink 1.3.2 does not yet exist. Do you mean 1.3.1 or latest master? >>>> >>>> Can you tell us whether this occurs only in 1.3.x and worked well >in >>>> 1.2.x? >>>> If you just keep the job running without savepoint/restore, you do >not >>>> get into backpressure situations? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Stephan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Kien Truong ><duckientru...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Fabian, >>>>> This happens to me even when the restore is immediate, so there's >not >>>>> much data in Kafka to catch up (5 minutes max) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Kien >>>>> On Jul 13, 2017, at 23:40, Fabian Hueske < fhue...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I would guess that this is quite usual because the job has to >>>>>> "catch-up" work. >>>>>> For example, if you took a save point two days ago and restore >the job >>>>>> today, the input data of the last two days has been written to >Kafka >>>>>> (assuming Kafka as source) and needs to be processed. >>>>>> The job will now read as fast as possible from Kafka to catch-up >to >>>>>> the presence. This means the data is much fast ingested (as fast >as Kafka >>>>>> can read and ship it) than during regular processing (as fast as >your >>>>>> sources produce). >>>>>> The processing speed is bound by your Flink job which means there >will >>>>>> be backpressure. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once the job caught-up, the backpressure should disappear. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, Fabian >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-07-13 15:48 GMT+02:00 Kien Truong <duckientru...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have one job where back-pressure is significantly higher >after >>>>>>> resuming from a save point. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because that job makes heavy use of stateful functions with >>>>>>> RocksDBStateBackend , >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm suspecting that this is the cause of performance >degradation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anyone encounter simillar issues or have any tips for >debugging ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm using Flink 1.3.2 with YARN in detached mode. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kien >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
