+1 for dropping support for Scala 2.10 On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the curious, here's the overall task in Spark: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14220 > > and most of the code-related changes: > > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645 > > and where it's stuck at the moment: > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spark-dev/201709.mbox/% > 3CCAMAsSdKe7Os80mX7jYaD2vNWLGWioBgCb4GG55eaN_iotFxZvw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:07 AM Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Aljoscha, >> >> I am in favor of the change. No concerns on my side, just one remark that >> I have talked to Sean last week (ccd) and he mentioned that he has faced >> some technical issues while driving the transition from 2.10 to 2.12 for >> Spark. It had to do with changes in the scope of implicits. You might end >> up hitting the same. >> >> Best, >> Marton >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Talking to some people I get the impression that Scala 2.10 is quite >>> outdated by now. I would like to drop support for Scala 2.10 and my main >>> motivation is that this would allow us to drop our custom Flakka build of >>> Akka that we use because newer Akka versions only support Scala 2.11/2.12 >>> and we need a backported feature. >>> >>> Are there any concerns about this? >>> >>> Best, >>> Aljoscha >> >> >>
