+1 to remove
> On 20. Dec 2019, at 10:34, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Okay, I understand. I'm okay with removing the profile.
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:34 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> The profiles make bumping ZooKeeper's version a bit more cumbersome. I
>> would be interested for this reason to get rid of them, too.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:35 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I guess we are talking about this profile [1] in the pom.xml?
>>>
>>> +1 to remove.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if we need to rush this for the 1.10 release. The profile is
>>> not doing us any harm at the moment.
>>>
>>> [1]https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/pom.xml#L1035
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> following the discussion started by Seth [1] I would like to discuss
>>>> dropping the vendor specific repositories from Flink's parent pom.xml. As
>>>> building Flink against a vendor specific Hadoop version is no longer
>>>> needed
>>>> (as it simply needs to be added to the classpath) and documented, I
>>>> believe
>>>> that the vendor specific repositories and the mapr profile have become
>>>> obsolete. Moreover, users can still use vendor specific Hadoop versions
>>>> if
>>>> they configure their local maven to point to the respective repository
>>>> [2].
>>>> Flink's sources would simply no longer be shipped with this option.
>>>>
>>>> Are there any concerns about dropping the vendor specific repositories
>>>> from
>>>> pom.xml? I would like to make this change for the upcoming Flink 1.10
>>>> release if possible.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/83afcf6c0d5d7a0a7179cbdac9593ebe7478b0dc548781bf9915a006%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-multiple-repositories.html
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>
