Would AsyncIO operator not be an option for you to connect to RDBMS?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 12:45 PM Alexey Trenikhun <yen...@msn.com> wrote:

> Thank you Yun Tang.
> My implementation potentially could block for significant amount of time,
> because I wanted to do RDBMS maintenance (create partitions for new data,
> purge old data etc) in-line with writing stream data to a database
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Yun Tang <myas...@live.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 26, 2020 8:42:37 AM
> *To:* Alexey Trenikhun <yen...@msn.com>; user@flink.apache.org <
> user@flink.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Blocking KeyedCoProcessFunction.processElement1
>
> Hi Alexey
>
> Actually, I don't understand why you thing
> KeyedCoProcessFunction#processElement1 would block for significant amount
> of time, it just process record from the elements in the first input stream
> which is necessary. If you really find it would block for a long time, I
> think that's because your processing logic has some problem to stuck. On
> the other hand, since processing checkpoint and records hold the same lock,
> we cannot process checkpoint when the record processing logic did not
> release the lock.
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Alexey Trenikhun <yen...@msn.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 13:04
> *To:* user@flink.apache.org <user@flink.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Blocking KeyedCoProcessFunction.processElement1
>
>
> Hello,
> If KeyedCoProcessFunction.processElement1 blocks for significant amount of
> time, will it prevent checkpoint ?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexey
>

Reply via email to