Thanks Marta for the clarification! On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:26 PM Marta Paes Moreira <ma...@ververica.com> wrote:
> Hi, Flavio. > > Indeed, Becket is the best person to answer this question, but as far as I > understand the idea is that Alink will be contributed back to Flink in the > form of a refactored Flink ML library (sitting on top of the Table API) > [1]. You can follow the progress of these efforts by tracking FLIP-39 [2]. > > [1] https://developpaper.com/why-is-flink-ai-worth-looking-forward-to/ > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-39+Flink+ML+pipeline+and+ML+libs > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:02 PM Gary Yao <g...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Flavio, >> >> I am looping in Becket (cc'ed) who might be able to answer your question. >> >> Best, >> Gary >> >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:19 PM Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi to all, >>> since Alink has been open sourced, is there any good reason to keep both >>> Flink ML and Alink? >>> From what I understood Alink already contains the best ML implementation >>> available for Flink..am I wrong? >>> Maybe it could make sense to replace the current Flink ML with that of >>> Alink..or is that impossible? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Flavio >>> >>
