Hey I created this one https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19238.
Regards, Juha ________________________________ From: Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:06 AM To: Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com>; Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> Cc: user@flink.apache.org <user@flink.apache.org> Subject: Re: Performance issue associated with managed RocksDB memory Hi Juha Would you please consider to contribute this back to community? If agreed, please open a JIRA ticket and we could help review your PR then. Best Yun Tang ________________________________ From: Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 19:05 To: Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> Cc: Yun Tang <myas...@live.com>; user@flink.apache.org <user@flink.apache.org> Subject: Re: Performance issue associated with managed RocksDB memory Hey I've fixed the code (https://github.com/juha-mynttinen-king/flink/commits/arena_block_sanity_check [github.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_juha-2Dmynttinen-2Dking_flink_commits_arena-5Fblock-5Fsanity-5Fcheck&d=DwMF-g&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=hTf9FuebMj0aLzV_UjCRbhNFqYu9xv-z-Prn7VzN3mY&s=A12CH1PvP6wSCYufQeyIDbZlQI6LluLvQslQc2dMrZk&e=>) slightly. Now it WARNs if there is the memory configuration issue. Also, I think there was a bug in the way the check calculated the mutable memory, fixed that. Also, wrote some tests. I tried the code and in my setup I get a bunch of WARN if the memory configuration issue is happening: 20200910T140320.516+0300 WARN RocksDBStateBackend performance will be poor because of the current Flink memory configuration! RocksDB will flush memtable constantly, causing high IO and CPU. Typically the easiest fix is to increase task manager managed memory size. If running locally, see the parameter taskmanager.memory.managed.size. Details: arenaBlockSize 8388608 < mutableLimit 7829367 (writeBufferSize 67108864 arenaBlockSizeConfigured 0 defaultArenaBlockSize 8388608 writeBufferManagerCapacity 8947848) [org.apache.flink.contrib.streaming.state.RocksDBOperationUtils.sanityCheckArenaBlockSize() @ 189] Regards, Juha ________________________________ From: Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 1:56 PM To: Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com> Cc: Yun Tang <myas...@live.com>; user@flink.apache.org <user@flink.apache.org> Subject: Re: Performance issue associated with managed RocksDB memory Hey Juha! I agree that we cannot reasonably expect from the majority of users to understand block sizes, area sizes, etc to get their application running. So the default should be "inform when there is a problem and suggest to use more memory." Block/arena size tuning is for the absolute expertes, the 5% super power users. The managed memory is 128 MB by default in the mini cluster. In a standalone session cluster setup with default config, it is 512 MB. Best, Stephan On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 11:10 AM Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com<mailto:juha.myntti...@king.com>> wrote: Hey Yun, About the docs. I saw in the docs (https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/ops/state/large_state_tuning.html [ci.apache.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ci.apache.org_projects_flink_flink-2Ddocs-2Dstable_ops_state_large-5Fstate-5Ftuning.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=61BtxMX6UCHk2TX2mluIR7QceE2iUPJGiu7Tzgt8zi8&s=WLTgjNYrq8bVj4LEDQSaJfqBYUymaBBn1rRF8UE8Dsc&e=>) this: "An advanced option (expert mode) to reduce the number of MemTable flushes in setups with many states, is to tune RocksDB’s ColumnFamily options (arena block size, max background flush threads, etc.) via a RocksDBOptionsFactory". Only after debugging this issue we're talking about, I figured that this snippet in the docs is probably talking about the issue I'm witnessing. I think there are two issues here: 1) it's hard/impossible to know what kind of performance one can expect from a Flink application. Thus, it's hard to know if one is suffering from e.g. from this performance issue, or if the system is performing normally (and inherently being slow). 2) even if one suspects a performance issue, it's very hard to find the root cause of the performance issue (memtable flush happening frequently). To find out this one would need to know what's the normal flush frequency. Also the doc says "in setups with many states". The same problem is hit when using just one state, but "high" parallelism (5). If the arena block size _ever_ needs to be configured only to "fix" this issue, it'd be best if there _never_ was a need to modify arena block size. What if we forget even mentioning arena block size in the docs and focus on the managed memory size, since managed memory size is something the user does tune. You're right that a very clear WARN message could also help to cope with the issue. What if there was a WARN message saying that performance will be poor and you should increase the managed memory size? And get rid of that arena block size decreasing example in the docs. Also, the default managed memory size is AFAIK 128MB right now. That could be increased. That would get rid of this issue in many cases. Regards, Juha ________________________________ From: Yun Tang <myas...@live.com<mailto:myas...@live.com>> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 8:05 PM To: Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com<mailto:juha.myntti...@king.com>>; user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org> <user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Performance issue associated with managed RocksDB memory Hi Juha I planned to give some descriptions in Flink documentation to give such hints, however, it has too many details for RocksDB and we could increase the managed memory size to a proper value to avoid this in most cases. Since you have come across this and reported in user mailing list, and I think it's worth to give some hints in Flink documentations. When talking about your idea to sanity check the arena size, I think a warning should be enough as Flink seems never throw exception directly when the performance could be poor. Best Yun Tang ________________________________ From: Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com<mailto:juha.myntti...@king.com>> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 20:56 To: Yun Tang <myas...@live.com<mailto:myas...@live.com>>; user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org> <user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Performance issue associated with managed RocksDB memory Hey Yun, Thanks for the detailed answer. It clarified how things work. Especially what is the role of RocksDB arena, and arena block size. I think there's no real-world case where it would make sense to start to a Flink job with RocksDB configured so that RocksDB flushes all the time, i.e. where the check "mutable_memtable_memory_usage() > mutable_limit_" is always true. The performance is just very poor and by using the same amount of RAM but just configuring RocksDB differently, performance could be e.g. 100 times better. It's very easy to hit this issue e.g. by just running a RocksDB-based Flink app using RocksDB with either slightly higher parallelism or with multiple operators. But finding out what and where the problem is very hard, e.g. because the issue is happening in native code and won't be visible even using a Java profiler. I wanted to see if it was possible to check the sanity of the arena block size and just make the app crash if the arena block size is too high (or the mutable limit too low). I came up with this https://github.com/juha-mynttinen-king/flink/tree/arena_block_sanity_check [github.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_juha-2Dmynttinen-2Dking_flink_tree_arena-5Fblock-5Fsanity-5Fcheck&d=DwMFAg&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=KeJGah-zF_IKVwAN9Wz50XduWWt3gQtTI0EucGoOgTw&s=lqc16JFtbr3jKDpvzdJF0BiUrrTAEYtNF_bqM9Wl1Vs&e=>. The code calculates the same parameters that are calculated in RocksDB and throws if the arena block size is higher than the "mutable limit". I did a few quick tests and the code seems to work, with small parallelism my app works, but with higher parallelism (when the app would flush all the time), it crashes with message like "arenaBlockSize 8388608 < mutableLimit 7340032 (writeBufferSize 67108864 arenaBlockSizeConfigured 0 defaultArenaBlockSize 8388608 writeBufferManagerCapacity 8388608). RocksDB would flush memtable constantly. Refusing to start. You can 1) make arena block size smaller, 2) decrease parallelism (if possible), 3) increase managed memory" Regards, Juha ________________________________ From: Yun Tang <myas...@live.com<mailto:myas...@live.com>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 6:58 AM To: Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com<mailto:juha.myntti...@king.com>>; user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org> <user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Performance issue associated with managed RocksDB memory Hi Juha Thanks for your enthusiasm to dig this problem and sorry for jumping in late for this thread to share something about write buffer manager in RocksDB. First of all, the reason why you meet the poor performance is due to writer buffer manager has been assigned a much lower limit (due to poor managed memory size on that slot) than actual needed. The competition of allocating memory between different column families lead RocksDB to switch active memtable to immutable memtable in advance, which leads to the poor performance as this increase the write amplification. To keep the memory not exceed the limit, write buffer manager would decide whether to flush the memtable in advance, which is the statement you found: mutable_memtable_memory_usage() > mutable_limit_ [1] and the memory usage includes allocated but not even used arean_block. When talking about the arena, memory allocator in RocksDB, I need to correct one thing in your thread: the block cache would not allocate any memory, all memory is allocated from arena. The core idea of RocksDB how to limit memory usage: arena allocates memory, write buffer manager decide when to switch memtable to control the active memory usage, and write buffer manager also accounts its allocated memory into the cache. The underlying block cache evict memory with accounting from write buffer manager and the cached block, filter & index. By default, arena_block_size is not configured, and it would be 1/8 of write buffer size [2]. And the default write buffer size is 64MB, that's why you could find "Options.arena_block_size: 8388608" in your logs. As you can see, RocksDB think it could use 64MB write buffer by default. However, Flink needs to control the total memory usage and has to configure write buffer manager based on the managed memory. From your logs "Write buffer is using 16789472 bytes out of a total of 17895697", I believe the managed memory of that slot (managed memory size / num of slots in one TM) is quite poor. If we have 1 slot with 1GB for task manager, the managed memory should be near 300MB which is fine for default RocksDB configuration. However, you just have about 90MB for the managed memory over that slot. When you enable managed memory on RocksDB, it would try its best to limit the total memory of all rocksDB instances within one slot under 90MB. Once you disable the managed memory control over rocksDB, each RocksDB instance could use about 64*2+8=136MB, since you have two operators here, they could use more than 200MB+ in one slot. There existed several solutions to mitigate this regression: 1. Increase the overall managed memory size for one slot. 2. Increase the write buffer ratio 3. Set the arean_block_size explicitly instead of default 8MB to avoid unwanted flush in advance: e.g: new ColumnFamilyOptions().setArenaBlockSize(2 * 1024 * 1024L); [1] https://github.com/dataArtisans/frocksdb/blob/49bc897d5d768026f1eb816d960c1f2383396ef4/include/rocksdb/write_buffer_manager.h#L47 [github.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_dataArtisans_frocksdb_blob_49bc897d5d768026f1eb816d960c1f2383396ef4_include_rocksdb_write-5Fbuffer-5Fmanager.h-23L47&d=DwMFAg&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=9dqFsA-w9rEcr782SVR8quiS2bKsubnmM8ZshIPBlNM&s=Xly6aYk9rvQu-c5yGlirem4FcuzQItD7dLJP-mROsVE&e=> [2] https://github.com/dataArtisans/frocksdb/blob/49bc897d5d768026f1eb816d960c1f2383396ef4/db/column_family.cc#L196 [github.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_dataArtisans_frocksdb_blob_49bc897d5d768026f1eb816d960c1f2383396ef4_db_column-5Ffamily.cc-23L196&d=DwMFAg&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=9dqFsA-w9rEcr782SVR8quiS2bKsubnmM8ZshIPBlNM&s=VQyThuy-5sP16APcviNgewjYr0fd43yZdxkyNw90Zzg&e=> Best Yun Tang ________________________________ From: Juha Mynttinen <juha.myntti...@king.com<mailto:juha.myntti...@king.com>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 15:56 To: user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org> <user@flink.apache.org<mailto:user@flink.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Performance issue associated with managed RocksDB memory The issue can be reproduced by using a certain combinations of the value of RocksDBOptions.WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO (default 0.5) and the Flink job parallelism. Examples that break: * Parallelism 1 and WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO 0.1 * Parallelism 5 and the default WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO 0.5 Examples that work: * Parallelism 1 and WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO 0.5, duration 34164 ms In a working case (parallelism 1, WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO 0.2) RocksDB log looks like this (right after the uninteresting bootup messages): 2020/08/21-12:55:41.693771 7f56e6643700 [db/db_impl.cc:1546] Created column family [valueState] (ID 1) 2020/08/21-12:55:42.213743 7f56e6643700 [db/db_impl_write.cc:1103] Flushing column family with largest mem table size. Write buffer is using 16789472 bytes out of a total of 17895697. 2020/08/21-12:55:42.213799 7f56e6643700 [db/db_impl_write.cc:1423] [valueState] New memtable created with log file: #3. Immutable memtables: 0. 2020/08/21-12:55:42.213924 7f56deffd700 (Original Log Time 2020/08/21-12:55:42.213882) [db/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc:1560] Calling FlushMemTableToOutputFile with column family [valueState], flush slots available 1, compaction slots available 1, flush slots scheduled 1, compaction slots scheduled 0 2020/08/21-12:55:42.213927 7f56deffd700 [db/flush_job.cc:304] [valueState] [JOB 2] Flushing memtable with next log file: 3 2020/08/21-12:55:42.213969 7f56deffd700 EVENT_LOG_v1 {"time_micros": 1598003742213958, "job": 2, "event": "flush_started", "num_memtables": 1, "num_entries": 170995, "num_deletes": 0, "memory_usage": 8399008, "flush_reason": "Write Buffer Full"} 2020/08/21-12:55:42.213973 7f56deffd700 [db/flush_job.cc:334] [valueState] [JOB 2] Level-0 flush table #9: started 2020/08/21-12:55:42.228444 7f56deffd700 EVENT_LOG_v1 {"time_micros": 1598003742228435, "cf_name": "valueState", "job": 2, "event": "table_file_creation", "file_number": 9, "file_size": 10971, "table_properties": {"data_size": 10200, "index_size": 168, "filter_size": 0, "raw_key_size": 18000, "raw_average_key_size": 18, "raw_value_size": 8000, "raw_average_value_size": 8, "num_data_blocks": 6, "num_entries": 1000, "filter_policy_name": "", "kDeletedKeys": "0", "kMergeOperands": "0"}} 2020/08/21-12:55:42.228460 7f56deffd700 [db/flush_job.cc:374] [valueState] [JOB 2] Level-0 flush table #9: 10971 bytes OK The main thing to look at is "num_entries": 170995, meaning RocksDB flushes a memtable with quite large number of entries. It flushes 53 times during the test, which sounds sensible. In a breaking case (parallelism 1, WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO 0.1) RocksDB log looks like this: 2020/08/21-12:53:02.917606 7f2cabfff700 [db/db_impl_write.cc:1103] Flushing column family with largest mem table size. Write buffer is using 8396784 bytes out of a total of 8947848. 2020/08/21-12:53:02.917702 7f2cabfff700 [db/db_impl_write.cc:1423] [valueState] New memtable created with log file: #3. Immutable memtables: 0. 2020/08/21-12:53:02.917988 7f2ca8bf1700 (Original Log Time 2020/08/21-12:53:02.917868) [db/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc:1560] Calling FlushMemTableToOutputFile with column family [valueState], flush slots available 1, compaction slots available 1, flush slots scheduled 1, compaction slots scheduled 0 2020/08/21-12:53:02.918004 7f2ca8bf1700 [db/flush_job.cc:304] [valueState] [JOB 2] Flushing memtable with next log file: 3 2020/08/21-12:53:02.918099 7f2ca8bf1700 EVENT_LOG_v1 {"time_micros": 1598003582918053, "job": 2, "event": "flush_started", "num_memtables": 1, "num_entries": 29, "num_deletes": 0, "memory_usage": 6320, "flush_reason": "Write Buffer Full"} 2020/08/21-12:53:02.918118 7f2ca8bf1700 [db/flush_job.cc:334] [valueState] [JOB 2] Level-0 flush table #9: started ... 2020/08/21-12:55:20.261887 7f2ca8bf1700 EVENT_LOG_v1 {"time_micros": 1598003720261879, "job": 20079, "event": "flush_started", "num_memtables": 1, "num_entries": 29, "num_deletes": 0, "memory_usage": 2240, "flush_reason": "Write Buffer Full"} 2020/08/21-12:55:20.261892 7f2ca8bf1700 [db/flush_job.cc:334] [valueState] [JOB 20079] Level-0 flush table #20085: started This time "num_entries": 29, meaning RocksDB flushes the memtable when there are only 29 entries consuming 6320 bytes memory. All memtable flushes look alike. There are total flushes 20079 times during the test, which is more than 300 times more than with the working config. Memtable flush and the compactions those will cause kill the performance. It looks like RocksDB flushes way too early, before the memtable should be considered full. But why? The answer lies in the RocksDB code. kingspace/frocksdb/db/db_impl_write.cc if (UNLIKELY(status.ok() && write_buffer_manager_->ShouldFlush())) { // Before a new memtable is added in SwitchMemtable(), // write_buffer_manager_->ShouldFlush() will keep returning true. If another // thread is writing to another DB with the same write buffer, they may also // be flushed. We may end up with flushing much more DBs than needed. It's // suboptimal but still correct. status = HandleWriteBufferFull(write_context); } ... Status DBImpl::HandleWriteBufferFull(WriteContext* write_context) { mutex_.AssertHeld(); assert(write_context != nullptr); Status status; // Before a new memtable is added in SwitchMemtable(), // write_buffer_manager_->ShouldFlush() will keep returning true. If another // thread is writing to another DB with the same write buffer, they may also // be flushed. We may end up with flushing much more DBs than needed. It's // suboptimal but still correct. ROCKS_LOG_INFO( immutable_db_options_.info_log, "Flushing column family with largest mem table size. Write buffer is " "using %" PRIu64 " bytes out of a total of %" PRIu64 ".", write_buffer_manager_->memory_usage(), write_buffer_manager_->buffer_size()); frocksdb/include/rocksdb/write_buffer_manager.h: bool ShouldFlush() const { if (enabled()) { if (mutable_memtable_memory_usage() > mutable_limit_) { return true; } if (memory_usage() >= buffer_size_ && mutable_memtable_memory_usage() >= buffer_size_ / 2) { // If the memory exceeds the buffer size, we trigger more aggressive // flush. But if already more than half memory is being flushed, // triggering more flush may not help. We will hold it instead. return true; } } return false; } Let's dig some params. There's the line in the logs "Flushing column family with largest mem table size. Write buffer is using 8396784 bytes out of a total of 8947848.". From that we can see: write_buffer_manager_->memory_usage() is 8396784 write_buffer_manager_->buffer_size() is 8947848 Additionally: buffer_size_ is 8947848. This can be seen e.g. putting a breakpoint in RocksDBMemoryControllerUtils.createWriteBufferManager() mutable_limit_ is buffer_size_ * 7 / 8 = 8947848 * 7 / 8 = 7829367 In ShouldFlush() "memory_usage() >= buffer_size_" is false, so the latter if-statement in ShouldFlush() is false. The 1st one has to be true. I'm not totally sure why this happens. Now I'm guessing. The memory RocksDB uses for the block cache is calculated in the memory memtable uses (in mutable_memtable_memory_usage()). In RocksDB conf: Options.arena_block_size: 8388608 If the block cache has allocated one of these blocks, this check: mutable_memtable_memory_usage() > mutable_limit_ Becomes: 8388608 + really_used_by_memtable > 7829367 8388608 + 6320 > 7829367 This is always true (even if memtable used 0 bytes of memory). ShouldFlush always returns true. This makes RocksDB constantly flush. Even if I didn't correctly understand the code, somehow the flushing happens constantly. The RocksDB docs https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/MemTable#flush [github.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_facebook_rocksdb_wiki_MemTable-23flush&d=DwMFAg&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=9dqFsA-w9rEcr782SVR8quiS2bKsubnmM8ZshIPBlNM&s=zayCxl8PK6XCl4IQfMmjHY_RUc1_-429d8xpvdwn5rE&e=> say memtable is flushed when "write_buffer_manager signals a flush". It seems that write buffer manager signaling to flush is happening here, but should it really? It feels odd (if it really is so) that block cache size affects the decision when the flush the memtable. Here's the latest test program. I've tested against Flink 1.11.1. /* * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 [apache.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.apache.org_licenses_LICENSE-2D2.0&d=DwMFAg&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=9dqFsA-w9rEcr782SVR8quiS2bKsubnmM8ZshIPBlNM&s=yegrE6BuvXIACM2U8ntJc4oJ7mo3t7McnNc4jsBVmoc&e=> * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ package org.apache.flink.streaming.examples.wordcount; import com.google.common.util.concurrent.RateLimiter; import org.apache.flink.api.common.functions.RichFlatMapFunction; import org.apache.flink.api.common.state.ListState; import org.apache.flink.api.common.state.ListStateDescriptor; import org.apache.flink.api.common.state.ValueState; import org.apache.flink.api.common.state.ValueStateDescriptor; import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeinfo.BasicTypeInfo; import org.apache.flink.api.java.tuple.Tuple2; import org.apache.flink.api.java.utils.MultipleParameterTool; import org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration; import org.apache.flink.contrib.streaming.state.RocksDBOptions; import org.apache.flink.contrib.streaming.state.RocksDBOptionsFactory; import org.apache.flink.contrib.streaming.state.RocksDBStateBackend; import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.FunctionInitializationContext; import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.FunctionSnapshotContext; import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.StateBackend; import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.checkpoint.CheckpointedFunction; import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.datastream.DataStream; import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.environment.StreamExecutionEnvironment; import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.DiscardingSink; import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.source.SourceFunction; import org.apache.flink.util.Collector; import org.rocksdb.ColumnFamilyOptions; import org.rocksdb.DBOptions; import org.rocksdb.InfoLogLevel; import java.nio.file.Files; import java.nio.file.Path; import java.util.Collection; import static org.apache.flink.contrib.streaming.state.PredefinedOptions.FLASH_SSD_OPTIMIZED; /** * Works fast in the following cases. * <ul> * <li>{@link #USE_MANAGED_MEMORY} is {@code false}</li> * <li>{@link #USE_MANAGED_MEMORY} is {@code true} and {@link #PARALLELISM} is 1 to 4.</li> * </ul> * <p> * Some results: * </p> * <ul> * <li>USE_MANAGED_MEMORY false parallelism 3: 3088 ms</li> * <li>USE_MANAGED_MEMORY false parallelism 4: 2971 ms</li> * <li>USE_MANAGED_MEMORY false parallelism 5: 2994 ms</li> * <li>USE_MANAGED_MEMORY true parallelism 3: 4337 ms</li> * <li>USE_MANAGED_MEMORY true parallelism 4: 2808 ms</li> * <li>USE_MANAGED_MEMORY true parallelism 5: 126050 ms</li> * </ul> * <p> */ public class WordCount { /** * The parallelism of the job. */ private static final int PARALLELISM = 1; /** * Whether to use managed memory. True, no changes in the config. * False, managed memory is disabled. */ private static final boolean USE_MANAGED_MEMORY = true; /** * If {@link #USE_MANAGED_MEMORY} is {@code true} has effect. * Sets the {@link RocksDBOptions#WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO}. */ private static Double WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO = 0.1; /** * The source synthesizes this many events. */ public static final int EVENT_COUNT = 1_000_000; /** * The value of each event is {@code EVENT_COUNT % MAX_VALUE}. * Essentially controls the count of unique keys. */ public static final int MAX_VALUE = 1_000; /** * If non-null, rate limits the events from the source. */ public static final Integer SOURCE_EVENTS_PER_SECOND = null; public static final boolean ENABLE_ROCKS_LOGGING = true; // ************************************************************************* // PROGRAMF // ************************************************************************* public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { // Checking input parameters final MultipleParameterTool params = MultipleParameterTool.fromArgs(args); // set up the execution environment Configuration configuration = new Configuration(); if (!USE_MANAGED_MEMORY) { configuration.setBoolean(RocksDBOptions.USE_MANAGED_MEMORY, USE_MANAGED_MEMORY); } else { if (WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO != null) { configuration.setDouble(RocksDBOptions.WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO, WRITE_BUFFER_RATIO.doubleValue()); } } final StreamExecutionEnvironment env = StreamExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(PARALLELISM, configuration); Path tempDirPath = Files.createTempDirectory("example"); String checkpointDataUri = "file://%22 + tempDirPath.toString(); RocksDBStateBackend rocksDBStateBackend = new RocksDBStateBackend(checkpointDataUri, true); if (ENABLE_ROCKS_LOGGING) { rocksDBStateBackend.setRocksDBOptions(new ExampleRocksDBOptionsFactory()); } else { rocksDBStateBackend.setPredefinedOptions(FLASH_SSD_OPTIMIZED); } env.setStateBackend((StateBackend) rocksDBStateBackend); // make parameters available in the web interface env.getConfig().setGlobalJobParameters(params); // get input data DataStream<Long> text = env.addSource(new ExampleCountSource()); text.keyBy(v -> v) .flatMap(new ValuesCounter()) .addSink(new DiscardingSink<>()); long before = System.currentTimeMillis(); env.execute("Streaming WordCount"); long duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - before; System.out.println("Done " + duration + " ms, parallelism " + PARALLELISM); } private static class ExampleRocksDBOptionsFactory implements RocksDBOptionsFactory { @Override public DBOptions createDBOptions(DBOptions currentOptions, Collection<AutoCloseable> handlesToClose) { currentOptions.setIncreaseParallelism(4) .setUseFsync(false) .setMaxOpenFiles(-1) .setKeepLogFileNum(10) .setInfoLogLevel(InfoLogLevel.INFO_LEVEL) .setStatsDumpPeriodSec(0) .setMaxLogFileSize(100 * 1024 * 1024); // 100 MB each return currentOptions; } @Override public ColumnFamilyOptions createColumnOptions(ColumnFamilyOptions currentOptions, Collection<AutoCloseable> handlesToClose) { return currentOptions; } } // ************************************************************************* // USER FUNCTIONS // ************************************************************************* private static class ValuesCounter extends RichFlatMapFunction<Long, Tuple2<Long, Long>> { private ValueState<Long> state; @Override public void flatMap(Long value, Collector<Tuple2<Long, Long>> out) throws Exception { Long oldCount = state.value(); if (oldCount == null) { oldCount = 0L; } long newCount = oldCount + 1; state.update(newCount); out.collect(Tuple2.of(value, newCount)); } @Override public void open(Configuration parameters) throws Exception { super.open(parameters); ValueStateDescriptor<Long> descriptor = new ValueStateDescriptor("valueState", BasicTypeInfo.LONG_TYPE_INFO); state = getRuntimeContext().getState(descriptor); } } public static class ExampleCountSource implements SourceFunction<Long>, CheckpointedFunction { private long count = 0L; private volatile boolean isRunning = true; private transient ListState<Long> checkpointedCount; private static final RateLimiter rateLimiter = SOURCE_EVENTS_PER_SECOND != null ? RateLimiter.create(SOURCE_EVENTS_PER_SECOND) : null; public void run(SourceContext<Long> ctx) { while (isRunning && count < EVENT_COUNT) { if (rateLimiter != null) { rateLimiter.acquire(); } // this synchronized block ensures that state checkpointing, // internal state updates and emission of elements are an atomic operation synchronized (ctx.getCheckpointLock()) { ctx.collect(count % MAX_VALUE); count++; } } } public void cancel() { isRunning = false; } public void initializeState(FunctionInitializationContext context) throws Exception { this.checkpointedCount = context .getOperatorStateStore() .getListState(new ListStateDescriptor<>("count", Long.class)); if (context.isRestored()) { for (Long count : this.checkpointedCount.get()) { this.count = count; } } } public void snapshotState(FunctionSnapshotContext context) throws Exception { this.checkpointedCount.clear(); this.checkpointedCount.add(count); } } } -- Sent from: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/ [apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__apache-2Dflink-2Duser-2Dmailing-2Dlist-2Darchive.2336050.n4.nabble.com_&d=DwMFAg&c=-0jfte1J3SKEE6FyZmTngg&r=-2x4lRPm2yEX3Ylri2jKFRC6zr9S6Iqg2kAJIspWwfA&m=9dqFsA-w9rEcr782SVR8quiS2bKsubnmM8ZshIPBlNM&s=xdutsLFVzPqnjT5kR1y76hiY-68pJNMeMHT5S7DL_d8&e=>
