I opened a PR. Feel free to try it out.

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14720

Btw:

>> env.createTemporarySystemFunction("LatestNonNullLong",
>> classOf[LatestNonNull[Long]])
>>
>> env.createTemporarySystemFunction("LatestNonNullString",
>> classOf[LatestNonNull[String]])

don't make a difference. The generics will be type erased in bytecode and only the class name matters.

Thanks,
Timo

On 21.01.21 11:36, Timo Walther wrote:
Hi Dylan,

thanks for the investigation. I can now also reproduce it my code. Yes, this is a bug. I opened

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21070

and will try to fix this asap.

Thanks,
Timo

On 20.01.21 17:52, Dylan Forciea wrote:
Timo,

I converted what I had to Java, and ended up with the exact same issue as before where it will work if I only ever use it on 1 type, but not if I use it on multiple. Maybe this is a bug?

Dylan

On 1/20/21, 10:06 AM, "Dylan Forciea" <dy...@oseberg.io> wrote:

     Oh, I think I might have a clue as to what is going on. I notice that it will work properly when I only call it on Long. I think that it is using the same generated code for the Converter for whatever was called first.

     Since in Scala I can't declare an object as static within the class itself, I wonder if it won't generate appropriate Converter code per subtype. I tried creating a subclass that is specific to the type within my class and returning that as the accumulator, but that didn't help. And, I can't refer to that class in the TypeInference since it isn't static and I get an error from Flink because of that. I'm going to see if I just write this UDF in Java with an embedded public static class like you have if it will solve my problems. I'll report back to let you know what I find. If that works, I'm not quite sure how to make it work in Scala.

     Regards,
     Dylan Forciea

     On 1/20/21, 9:34 AM, "Dylan Forciea" <dy...@oseberg.io> wrote:

         As a side note, I also just tried to unify into a single function registration and used _ as the type parameter in the classOf calls there and within the TypeInference definition for the accumulator and still ended up with the exact same stack trace.

         Dylan

         On 1/20/21, 9:22 AM, "Dylan Forciea" <dy...@oseberg.io> wrote:

             Timo,

             I appreciate it! I am using Flink 1.12.0 right now with the Blink planner. What you proposed is roughly what I had come up with the first time around that resulted in the stack trace with the ClassCastException I had originally included. I saw that you had used a Row instead of just the value in our example, but changing it that way didn't seem to help, which makes sense since the problem seems to be in the code generated for the accumulator Converter and not the output.

             Here is the exact code that caused that error (while calling LatestNonNullLong):

             The registration of the below:
env.createTemporarySystemFunction("LatestNonNullLong", classOf[LatestNonNull[Long]]) env.createTemporarySystemFunction("LatestNonNullString", classOf[LatestNonNull[String]])


             The class itself:

             import java.time.LocalDate
             import java.util.Optional
             import org.apache.flink.table.api.DataTypes
             import org.apache.flink.table.catalog.DataTypeFactory
             import org.apache.flink.table.functions.AggregateFunction
             import org.apache.flink.table.types.inference.{InputTypeStrategies, TypeInference}

             case class LatestNonNullAccumulator[T](
                 var value: T = null.asInstanceOf[T],
                 var date: LocalDate = null)

             class LatestNonNull[T] extends AggregateFunction[T, LatestNonNullAccumulator[T]] {

               override def createAccumulator(): LatestNonNullAccumulator[T] = {
                 LatestNonNullAccumulator[T]()
               }

               override def getValue(acc: LatestNonNullAccumulator[T]): T = {
                 acc.value
               }

               def accumulate(acc: LatestNonNullAccumulator[T], value: T, date: LocalDate): Unit = {
                 if (value != null) {
                   Option(acc.date).fold {
                     acc.value = value
                     acc.date = date
                   } { accDate =>
                     if (date != null && date.isAfter(accDate)) {
                       acc.value = value
                       acc.date = date
                     }
                   }
                 }
               }

               def merge(
                   acc: LatestNonNullAccumulator[T],
                   it: java.lang.Iterable[LatestNonNullAccumulator[T]]): Unit = {
                 val iter = it.iterator()
                 while (iter.hasNext) {
                   val a = iter.next()
                   if (a.value != null) {
                     Option(acc.date).fold {
                       acc.value = a.value
                       acc.date = a.date
                     } { accDate =>
                       Option(a.date).map { curDate =>
                         if (curDate.isAfter(accDate)) {
                           acc.value = a.value
                           acc.date = a.date
                         }
                       }
                     }
                   }
                 }
               }

               def resetAccumulator(acc: LatestNonNullAccumulator[T]): Unit = {
                 acc.value = null.asInstanceOf[T]
                 acc.date = null
               }

               override def getTypeInference(typeFactory: DataTypeFactory): TypeInference = {
                 TypeInference
                   .newBuilder()
                   .inputTypeStrategy(InputTypeStrategies
                     .sequence(InputTypeStrategies.ANY, InputTypeStrategies.explicit(DataTypes.DATE())))
                   .accumulatorTypeStrategy { callContext =>
                     val accDataType = DataTypes.STRUCTURED(
                       classOf[LatestNonNullAccumulator[T]],
                       DataTypes.FIELD("value", callContext.getArgumentDataTypes.get(0)),
                       DataTypes.FIELD("date", DataTypes.DATE()))

                     Optional.of(accDataType)
                   }
                   .outputTypeStrategy { callContext =>
                     val outputDataType = callContext.getArgumentDataTypes().get(0);
                     Optional.of(outputDataType);
                   }
                   .build()
               }
             }

             Regards,
             Dylan Forciea

             On 1/20/21, 2:37 AM, "Timo Walther" <twal...@apache.org> wrote:

                 Hi Dylan,

                 I'm assuming your are using Flink 1.12 and the Blink planner?

                 Beginning from 1.12 you can use the "new" aggregate functions with a                  better type inference. So TypeInformation will not be used in this stack.

                 I tried to come up with an example that should explain the rough design.                  I will include this example into the Flink code base. I hope this helps:



                 import org.apache.flink.table.types.inference.InputTypeStrategies;

                 public static class LastIfNotNull<T>
                          extends AggregateFunction<Row, LastIfNotNull.Accumulator<T>> {

                      public static class Accumulator<T> {
                          public T value;
                          public LocalDate date;
                      }

                      public void accumulate(Accumulator<T> acc, T input, LocalDate date) {
                          if (input != null) {
                              acc.value = input;
                              acc.date = date;
                          }
                      }

                      @Override
                      public Row getValue(Accumulator<T> acc) {
                          return Row.of(acc.value, acc.date);
                      }

                      @Override
                      public Accumulator<T> createAccumulator() {
                          return new Accumulator<>();
                      }

                      @Override
                      public TypeInference getTypeInference(DataTypeFactory typeFactory) {
                          return TypeInference.newBuilder()
                                  .inputTypeStrategy(
                                          InputTypeStrategies.sequence(
InputTypeStrategies.ANY,

                 InputTypeStrategies.explicit(DataTypes.DATE())))
                                  .accumulatorTypeStrategy(
                                          callContext -> {
                                              DataType accDataType =
DataTypes.STRUCTURED( Accumulator.class, DataTypes.FIELD( "value",

                 callContext.getArgumentDataTypes().get(0)),
DataTypes.FIELD("date",
                 DataTypes.DATE()));
                                              return Optional.of(accDataType);
                                          })
                                  .outputTypeStrategy(
                                          callContext -> {
                                              DataType argDataType =
                 callContext.getArgumentDataTypes().get(0);
                                              DataType outputDataType =
                                                      DataTypes.ROW(
DataTypes.FIELD("value",
                 argDataType),
DataTypes.FIELD("date",
                 DataTypes.DATE()));
                                              return Optional.of(outputDataType);
                                          })
                                  .build();
                      }
                 }

                 Regards,
                 Timo



                 On 20.01.21 01:04, Dylan Forciea wrote:
                 > I am attempting to create an aggregate UDF that takes a generic                  > parameter T, but for the life of me, I can’t seem to get it to work.
                 >
                 > The UDF I’m trying to implement takes two input arguments, a value that                  > is generic, and a date. It will choose the non-null value with the                  > latest associated date. I had originally done this with separate Top 1                  > queries connected with a left join, but the memory usage seems far                  > higher than doing this with a custom aggregate function.
                 >
                 > As a first attempt, I tried to use custom type inference to have it                  > validate that the first argument type is the output type and have a                  > single function, and also used DataTypes.STRUCTURE to try to define the                  > shape of my accumulator. However, that resulted in an exception like                  > this whenever I tried to use a non-string value as the first argument:
                 >
                 > [error] Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long cannot
                 > be cast to java.lang.String
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > io$oseberg$flink$udf$LatestNonNullAccumulator$Converter.toInternal(Unknown
                 > Source)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.table.data.conversion.StructuredObjectConverter.toInternal(StructuredObjectConverter.java:92)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.table.data.conversion.StructuredObjectConverter.toInternal(StructuredObjectConverter.java:47)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.table.data.conversion.DataStructureConverter.toInternalOrNull(DataStructureConverter.java:59)
                 >
                 > [error]   at GroupAggsHandler$777.getAccumulators(Unknown Source)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.table.runtime.operators.aggregate.GroupAggFunction.processElement(GroupAggFunction.java:175)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.table.runtime.operators.aggregate.GroupAggFunction.processElement(GroupAggFunction.java:45)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.KeyedProcessOperator.processElement(KeyedProcessOperator.java:85)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.OneInputStreamTask$StreamTaskNetworkOutput.emitRecord(OneInputStreamTask.java:193)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.StreamTaskNetworkInput.processElement(StreamTaskNetworkInput.java:179)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.StreamTaskNetworkInput.emitNext(StreamTaskNetworkInput.java:152)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.StreamOneInputProcessor.processInput(StreamOneInputProcessor.java:67)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.processInput(StreamTask.java:372)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.mailbox.MailboxProcessor.runMailboxLoop(MailboxProcessor.java:186)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.runMailboxLoop(StreamTask.java:575)
                 >
                 > [error]   at
                 > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:539)
                 >
                 > [error]   at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.doRun(Task.java:722)
                 >
                 > [error]   at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:547)
                 >
                 > [error]   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
                 >
                 > Figuring that I can’t do something of that sort, I tried to follow the                  > general approach in the Sum accumulator[1] in the Flink source code                  > where separate classes are derived from a base class, and each                  > advertises its accumulator shape, but ended up with the exact same stack                  > trace as above when I tried to create and use a function specifically
                 > for a non-string type like Long.
                 >
                 > Is there something I’m missing as far as how this is supposed to be                  > done? Everything I try either results in a stack track like the above,                  > or type erasure issues when trying to get type information for the                  > accumulator. If I just copy the generic code multiple times and just                  > directly use Long or String rather than using subclassing, then it works
                 > just fine. I appreciate any help I can get on this!
                 >
                 > Regards,
                 >
                 > Dylan Forciea
                 >
                 > [1]
                 > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-1.12.0/flink-table/flink-table-planner/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/functions/aggfunctions/SumAggFunction.scala
                 >







Reply via email to