I think you're misinterpreting my comment.
Independent from the repo split we should only keep the connectors in
the Flink project that we actively maintain.
The rest we might as well just drop.
If some external people are interested in maintaining these connectors
then there's nothing stopping them from doing so.
For example, I don't think our Cassandra connector is neither in good
shape nor appears to be a big priority.
I would not mind us dropping it (== or moving it into some external
repo, to me that's all the same).
Kafka would be a different story.
On 18/10/2021 15:22, Arvid Heise wrote:
I would like to avoid treating some connectors different from other
connectors by design. In reality, we can assume that some connectors will
receive more love than others. However, if we already treat some connectors
"better" than others we may run in a vicious cycle where the "bad" ones
never improve.
Nevertheless, I'd also be fine to just start with some of them and move
others later.
