hi,
thanks for your reply,
we are storing the data in memory since it is a short term we thought that
adding rocksdb will add overhead.


On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM Sachin Mittal <sjmit...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> Where are you storing the state.
> Try rocksdb.
>
> Thanks
> Sachin
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 6:19 PM, Sigalit Eliazov <e.siga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to understand the following behavior in our Flink application
>> cluster. Any assistance would be appreciated.
>>
>> We are running a Flink application cluster with 5 task managers, each
>> with the following configuration:
>>
>>    - jobManagerMemory: 12g
>>    - taskManagerMemory: 20g
>>    - taskManagerMemoryHeapSize: 12g
>>    - taskManagerMemoryNetworkMax: 4g
>>    - taskManagerMemoryNetworkMin: 1g
>>    - taskManagerMemoryManagedSize: 50m
>>    - taskManagerMemoryOffHeapSize: 2g
>>    - taskManagerMemoryNetworkFraction: 0.2
>>    - taskManagerNetworkMemorySegmentSize: 4mb
>>    - taskManagerMemoryFloatingBuffersPerGate: 64
>>    - taskmanager.memory.jvm-overhead.min: 256mb
>>    - taskmanager.memory.jvm-overhead.max: 2g
>>    - taskmanager.memory.jvm-overhead.fraction: 0.1
>>
>> Our pipeline includes stateful transformations, and we are verifying that
>> we clear the state once it is no longer needed.
>>
>> Through the Flink UI, we observe that the heap size increases and
>> decreases during the job lifecycle.
>>
>> However, there is a noticeable delay between clearing the state and the
>> reduction in heap size usage, which I assume is related to the garbage
>> collector frequency.
>>
>> What is puzzling is the task manager pod memory usage. It appears that
>> the memory usage increases intermittently and is not released. We verified
>> the different state metrics and confirmed they are changing according to
>> the logic.
>>
>> Additionally, if we had a state that was never released, I would expect
>> to see the heap size increasing constantly as well.
>>
>> Any insights or ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sigalit
>>
>

Reply via email to