Hi Ufuk, thanks for the tip. I am already happy to know it will be on dashboard one day. Shall I open a ticket/feature request?
For the moment I rely on old school note of execution time. The dataset will not change much, and I can have a reference once I get it to complete the first overall process. :-) saluti, Stefano 2014-11-13 15:46 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[email protected]>: > Hey Stefano, > > this is definitely possible and also not hard to count. See the > RecordWriter class, which emits all records to the network runtime. The > problem at the moment is that we don't have a central service or the like, > which would be able to aggregate these kinds of runtime information and > then (for example) have them displayed on the web interface. > > This is on the agenda and in my opinion is very important. > > If this is important for you, I could add debug log messages or so, which > you would then have to parse on your own. Would that be feasible as a short > term solution? > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Stefano Bortoli <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> working with the dashboard I found extremely nice to have a monitor of >> the tasks processing. I wonder whether it is feasible, or could be >> interesting, to have a counter associated with the processing of each of >> the functions. I would not mind to have a little overhead in the overall >> process if I could understand where I am and be able to estimate the >> process duration. :-) >> >> what do you think? >> >> saluti, >> Stefano >> > >
