Apache flume 1.4 Tarball
________________________________
From: Hari Shreedharan [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 9:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: File Channel Exception "Failed to obtain lock for writing to the 
log.Try increasing the log write timeout value"

What version of Flume are you using?


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mangtani, Kushal 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Bumping this up; to make sure someone answers this.

P.S: let me know if i need to post these questions on a seperate thread.

Thanks,
Kushal Mangtani

________________________________
From: Mangtani, Kushal
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 12:39 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: File Channel Exception "Failed to obtain lock for writing to the 
log.Try increasing the log write timeout value"

Hello FlumeTeam,

I have recently seen a bug/weird behaviour in File Channel. I am using 
FileChannel in my prod env; so save me from hickups in my prod. Recently, I got 
my file Channel Full.
So; the only ways of fixing this was:

  1.  restart the flume process.
  2.  twaek the transactionCapacity of fileChannel.

i went with 1) .However, after doing so; my flume ps was stuck and the logs 
were:


08 Aug 2014 19:03:54,014 INFO  [lifecycleSupervisor-1-4] 
(org.apache.flume.channel.file.LogFile$SequentialReader.next:597)  - File 
position exceeds the threshold: 1623195647, position: 1623195649

08 Aug 2014 19:03:54,015 INFO  [lifecycleSupervisor-1-4] 
(org.apache.flume.channel.file.LogFile$SequentialReader.next:608)  - 
Encountered EOF at 1623195649 in 
/usr/lib/flume-ng/datastore/channel1/logs/log-5802


Looks like for some reason FilePointer was at a position > than the FileSize. 
Ultimately; I had to delete the logs,checkpoint,backup-checkpoint for my flume 
process to process events.

Sp; the whole purpose of FileChannel i.e better durability vs average 
performance was defeated here.


Questions:

  1.  Is there something I can have done to preserve this data Loss ?
  2.  Also; I believ Flume-ng is push -pull mechanism; where source pushes 
events to channels and sinks pulls events from channels which is contradictory 
to flume-og (push only mechanism). Correct me if im wrong? Was there a reason 
for this push-pull architecture in flume-land ?

Thanks,
Kushal Mangtani

________________________________
From: Hari Shreedharan 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 11:38 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: File Channel Exception "Failed to obtain lock for writing to the 
log.Try increasing the log write timeout value"

It is currently in trunk, so it will be in flume 1.5


Thanks,
Hari


On Friday, February 28, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Mangtani, Kushal wrote:

Hari,



Thanks for the feedback.This was really helpful. I am going to use provisioned 
IO for a while to make sure the exception does not comes back.



Also, from the comments section of the Jira ticket given below, I noticed that 
you were able to identify the reason of the exception perhaps old logs are 
never deleted. Are you guys going to put a patch to in flume 1.5 so that this 
exception is resolved?



-Kushal mangtani



From: Hari Shreedharan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: File Channel Exception "Failed to obtain lock for writing to the 
log.Try increasing the log write timeout value"



See 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2307<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2307&k=OWT%2FB14AE7ysJN06F7d2nQ%3D%3D%0A&r=Ige9%2FQENXuGqSGiXpuvHakVLuIySu7e10oNaj%2FGB%2B0I%3D%0A&m=PM9%2FMPLJ2TJ%2Fh%2BBMW%2BqpQ1UrxcZbZNPwx5%2FdhkJpEaw%3D%0A&s=91453e467ee8ed73fb29bace503614ae8091d624bdba0f77dedaf43b18e46c41>



This jira removed the write-timeout, but that only makes sure that there is no 
transaction in limbo. The real reason like I said is slow IO. Try using 
provisioned IO for better throughput.





Thanks,

Hari



On Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Mangtani, Kushal wrote:

Hari,



Thanks for the prompt reply. The current file channel’s  write-timeout = 30 sec 
.EBS drive current  capacity = 200 GB . The rate of writes is 60 events/min; 
where each event is approx. 40 KB.



I am thinking of increase file channel write-timeout to 60 sec. What do you 
suggest?

Also,one strange thing I noticed all the flume-collectors  also get the same 
exception.However, all have a separate ebs drive. Any inputs?



Thanks,

Kushal Mangtani



From: Hari Shreedharan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:35 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: File Channel Exception "Failed to obtain lock for writing to the 
log.Try increasing the log write timeout value"



For now, increase the file channel’s write-timeout parameter to around 30 or so 
(basically file channel is timing out while writing to disk). But the basic 
problem you are seeing is that your EBS instance is very slow and IO is taking 
too long. You either need to increase your EBS IO capacity, or reduce the rate 
or writes.





Thanks,

Hari



On Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Mangtani, Kushal wrote:





From: Mangtani, Kushal
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 4:51 PM
To: '[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'; 
'[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'
Cc: Rangnekar, Rohit; '[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'
Subject: File Channel Exception "Failed to obtain lock for writing to the 
log.Try increasing the log write timeout value"



Hi,



I'm using Flume-Ng 1.4 cdh4.4 Tarball for collecting aggregated logs.

I am running a 2 tier(agent,collector) Flume Configuration with custom plugins. 
There are approximately 20 agents (receiving data) and 6 collector flume 
(writing to HDFS) machines all running independenly. However, I have been 
facing some File Channel Exceptions on the collector side. The agent appears to 
be working fine.



 Error  stacktrace:

                             org.apache.flume.ChannelException: Failed to 
obtain lock for writing to the log. Try increasing the log write timeout value. 
[channel=c2]

                             at 
org.apache.flume.channel.file.FileChannel$FileBackedTransaction.doRollback(FileChannel.java:621)

                             at 
org.apache.flume.channel.BasicTransactionSemantics.rollback(BasicTransactionSemantics.java:168)

                             at 
org.apache.flume.sink.hdfs.HDFSEventSink.process(HDFSEventSink.java:421)

                             at 
org.apache.flume.sink.DefaultSinkProcessor.process(DefaultSinkProcessor.java:68)

                             at 
org.apache.flume.SinkRunner$PollingRunner.run(SinkRunner.java:147)

                             …..

                             And I keep on getting the same error



                             P.S :This same exception is repated in most of the 
flume collector machines.But, not at the same duration. There is usually a 
difference of a couple of hours or more.



1.  HDFS sinks are written in  the Amazon EC2 cloud instance.

2. datadir and checkpoint dir of file channel in all flume collector instances 
are mounted to a separate hadoop ebs drive .This makes sure that two separate 
collectors do not overlap their log and checkpoint dir. There is a symbolic 
link i.e /usr/lib/flume-ng/datasource --> /hadoop/ebs/mnt-1

3. The Flume works fine for a couple of days and all the agent,collector are 
initialized properly without exceptions.



Questions:

Exception “Failed to obtain lock for writing to the log. Try increasing the log 
write timeout value . [channel=c2]” . According to the documentation, such an 
exception occurs only if two processes are acceesing the same file/directory. 
However, each channel is configured separately so No two channels should access 
the same dir. Hence, this exception does not indicates anything. Please correct 
me, if im wrong.

Also, HDFS.CallTimeout – indicates calling HDFS for open,write operations. If 
no response within a duration, it timeouts. And , if its timeouts; it closes 
the File. Please correct me, if im wrong.  Also, if there is a way to specify 
the number of retries before it closes the file?



Your inputs/suggestions will be thoroughly appreciated.





Regards

Kushal Mangtani

Software Engineer








Reply via email to