All, I have the following scenario:
1 JMS Source, 2 channels, 1 sink per channel; When the first channel stops, for instance due to space issues, channel 2 stops as well. No data is pulled from the JMS. When channel 1 opens up, no data is lost, all sinks are equal; When the second channel stops however, the first channel continues, data is still being pulled from the JMS and can no longer be processed by channel 2 when it opens up. Data loss happens on the sink connected to channel 2. Ergo, priority lies with the first defined channel in the configuration. I would expect that the source stops pulling from the JMS when one of both channels is unable to accept a message; Not just the first channel. Can someone explain this to me and/or give any advice to mitigate this? --Jorn Eilander ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ATTENTION: The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient , don't use or disclose it in anyway. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
