Cameron McCormack wrote: > David Crossley: > > Please attach it to a new Issue at Cocoon's issue tracker > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON > > Ok, though perhaps a different solution would be better... > > > Me either. Here are some tips, but i am not even sure > > if they are up-to-date. > > http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/g1/798.html > > That seems to work, thanks.
Fantastic. It will be comforting for the cocoon-dev people to know that Cocoon-2.2 trunk is usable. > So after thinking about it, I'm not sure if changing the > LinkRewriterTransformer is the right solution. Perhaps you want to > have some schemes that don't include the fragment (e.g., site:) and > others that do (e.g., an rdf: scheme that identifies RDF literals, > where fragment identifiers are important). You'd need two linkrewriter > instances for that. > > So I think it's more that the SimpleMappingMetaModule is insufficient to > describe the mapping of 'A#B' to 'concat(/site//A/@href, "#B")' for the > key to the XMLFileModule. > > What do you think the right solution to this should be? A > MoreComplexMappingMetaModule that can construct such keys? How general > should this be? And where should it go, in Cocoon or Forrest? It is beyond me, and nobody else has answered you. Anyway, i think that it is a topic for [EMAIL PROTECTED] -David
