Hello Olivier, The servers are all part of the same cluster so they still communicate with each other, even if they belong to a different *server-group*. The main idea of the *server-group* functionality is to organize your members into logical sets or groups, and to use this differentiation to assign tasks/traffic/data to a pre-defined set of members instead of the whole cluster. More details about this can be found in *Organizing Peers into Logical Member Groups*, both for the peer to peer [1] and client/server [2] topologies. Hope this helps. Cheers.
[1]: http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/12/topologies_and_comm/p2p_configuration/configuring_peer_member_groups.html [2]: http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/12/topologies_and_comm/cs_configuration/configure_servers_into_logical_groups.html On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Olivier Mallassi < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello all > > sorry for this dumb question but I would like to confirm that JVMs > belonging to different server-group do not exchange any membership > information. > > So, if I have a cluster with 3 server-group, then the membership > communication occurs within this 3 server-group independently. > > Thx a lot. > > Olivier. > -- Juan José Ramos Cassella Senior Technical Support Engineer Email: [email protected] Office#: +353 21 4238611 Mobile#: +353 87 2074066 After Hours Contact#: +1 877 477 2269 Office Hours: Mon - Thu 08:30 - 17:00 GMT. Fri 08:30 - 16:00 GMT How to upload artifacts: https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/204369073 How to escalate a ticket: https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/203809556 [image: support] <https://support.pivotal.io/> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/pivotal> [image: linkedin] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/3048967> [image: facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/pivotalsoftware> [image: google plus] <https://plus.google.com/+Pivotal> [image: youtube] <https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAdzTan_eSPScpj2J50ErtzR9ANSzv3kl>
