Hi, Trying to get more understanding on client region caching_proxy vs proxy. The caching_proxy seems is much more performant since it has a local cache. And it also sync with server cache every time it see a change. So in which scenario I need to use proxy instead of caching_proxy? Sounds like I always want to use caching_proxy. Is that because cache proxy has slight chance lose data when local update commit but not sync to server yet and at this particular point. The client region crashes and losing the data?
Thanks, Nan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
