Usually a client will not need jgroups since it should not have any peers so I think you are correct that the client dependencies could be less than the server dependencies. Seems like a good idea.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Luke Shannon <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been playing with developing applications using Spring Boot that > work with Geode in a client server model. > > This is very helpful: > https://spring.io/blog/2015/06/12/spring-data-gemfire-supports-apache-geode > > But I wonder if it would make sense to have a set of dependancies for > client projects and another for a server side project? > > If I just want to code a client, would I need all of the dependancies that > come with the entire Geode package? > > I am bringing this up because it seems like I am having some dependancy > issues when I bring the Geode dependancy into an existing Boot app. I have > not figured it out yet, so this could be user error, but I wonder if things > like gemfire-jgroups are needed for a client application? > > > > > > > > > > Join the Toronto Pivotal Usergroup: > http://www.meetup.com/Toronto-Pivotal-User-Group/ >
