+1 for JDK 8 / Language Level 8 as well. Please remember that JDK 7 is already no longer updated - https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_7.xml <https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_7.xml> since April/2015.
~/William > On Jul 27, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Kirk Lund <[email protected]> wrote: > > True enough! I guess there's nothing preventing us from moving Geode to JDK > 1.8 now. > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Lyndon Adams <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Why do you need to wait until "customers move to 1.8" when geode is an open > source product? Surely customers are using a paid support version. Am I > missing something? > > Lyndon Adams > London, SW11 > > On 25 Jul 2015, at 07:33, Kirk Lund <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Oi João, >> >> Our current source code level is Java 1.7. We just added 1.8 support >> meaning that we build/compile the product under 1.7 JDK and then test with >> both 1.7 and 1.8 JREs. >> >> We won't be able to drop 1.7 support until all customers move to 1.8 >> (hopefully soon but probably not in 2015). >> >> -Kirk >> >> On Friday, July 24, 2015, João Peixoto <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Thanks (obrigado ;) ) William. >> >> If I were to contribute to the project with a PR, which level should I >> respect? >> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:40 PM William Markito <[email protected] <>> >> wrote: >> Hi João (Opa, tudo bem ?) >> >> Actually it's supposed to be Java 7 but there are areas that needs to be >> updated. >> >> But you should be also fine to run and compile with Java 8. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:32 PM, João Peixoto <[email protected] <>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > I'm looking at the source code and I was wondering what is the language >> > level that Geode is aiming for. Currently it seems compatible with Java >> > 1.6, wondering if that minimum will be raised. >
