The clock synchronization service is only used to create timestamps that are used in active-active WAN conflict resolution. We've found that the service is not reliable under load and have removed it from Geode as part of the GEODE-77 work. The infrastructure is still in place to insert a new clock synchronization service in the future.

Le 12/5/2015 7:03 AM, Jacob Barrett a écrit :
Geode keeps its own synchronized clock in a cluster. If that clock changes significantly this warning is logged. Usually this means your hosts are not synchronized to the same source in NTP, their source changed to one that had large skew from the previous, or the internal clock is skewing faster than NTP can keep up with.

-Jake


—

Jacob Barrett
Manager
GemFire Advanced Customer Engineering (ACE)
Pivotal

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
503-533-3763

For immediate support please contact Pivotal Support at http://support.pivotal.io/




On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Catanzarite, P. (Paul) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello – I received this warning message in our locator log and was
    wondering if anyone knows what this means and if there is any
    action that needs to be taken.

    <UDP ucast receiver> tid=0x20] New cache time offset calculated is
    off more than 223 ms from earlier offset.

    Thank you in advance.

    -Paul


    ---------------------------------------------------------

    NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail message
    is confidential and intended only for certain recipients.  If you
    are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
    disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this
    communication and any attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you
    have received this communication in error, please notify the
    sender by reply transmission and delete the message without
    copying or disclosing it.

    
============================================================================================



Reply via email to