Hi Ricardo Gil That's really great you showed your interest in Geronimo documentation.This the most ideal area to start with Geronimo newbie.I think you have taken the right start.
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 18:59 +0100, Ricardo Gil wrote: > Hi > I'm starting to use geronimo and I'm trying to work with 2.0 version > so I'm too newbie but I think I have a good learning speed and I'm > enjoying geronimo. I would offer my help but I don't know where can I > help. May be you could lead me into the right area. > > I've made an attempt to port the JMS and MDB sample of v1.1 but I'm > stucked with the EJB, it fails in the deployment. The rest of the > sample works correctly with some version and package changes (and > changing the JNDI lookup). It would be a great sample to add to 2.0 > docs. You can always shoot your issues to get help from the mailing list.Most of the Authors of the G v1.1 are active in the mailing list.Only thing is you have to provide more details and be more specific (for an example pasting the exact error message or what you have tried to fix ) regards to your question.It will make everything fast. > One of the most interesting sample in v1.1 is the advanced plugin > sample. There are changes in the way plugins are generated and > deployed into geronimo? I've made my tests here with a dumb plugin but > I can't configure car maven-plugin in order to set the destination > repository. I need to work more on that... I think I'm trying to go > too fast for me. It would be great to have this sample in geronimo 2.0 > docs. Contributors,Volunteers and Users comments and idea are very important to make G better. > > Oh, I'm spanish so if geronimo project is searching a spanish > traductor, maybe I could help here in my free time too. Excellent !!! > > Let me know if you think I can help here! Thanks for your work :) I'm > enjoying this app server :). I think Hernan already pointed out very good areas to get going with you. cheers Kanchana > > On 2/7/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What you see there is the content I've been working on so far, it is not a > > proposal for a TOC. In fact, that is what my note is about, asking feedback > > for topics to cover as well as volunteers to cover some of those topics. > > > > Absolutely, XML schemas and deployment plans should be part of the Geronimo > > v2.0 documentation just like how we have them in the Geronimo v1.1 > > documentation. Sort of related to the same topic would also be > > "Annotations". > > > > On a different thread I saw you guys plan to work on this area (schemas and > > plans) for Geronimo v1.2 which is great, I'm taking granted you are > > volunteering to tackle v2.0 too, right!? ;-) > > My only concern with v2.0, and Dain pointed it out too, some of the plans > > will dramatically change throughout the 2.0 development process as the > > specifications and additional functionality get fully integrated, specially > > in the EJB3 area. > > > > All, what other topics would you like to see covered in the v2.0 > > documentation? volunteering for some? ;-) > > Never is too much info when talking about doc, isn't it!? > > > > Cheers! > > Hernan > > > > Kanchana Welagedara wrote: > > > Hi Hernan > > > > > > I assume you have come up with the planed content of G2.0 as shown in > > > the below in the given url.I would like to know why the deployment plan > > > and xmls schema documents are missing in the content.I think M2 has more > > > to document in this area. > > > Any thoughts Hernan? > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Kanchana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 15:59 -0500, Hernan Cunico wrote: > > >> Hi All, > > >> I'm updating the existing Geronimo documentation to v2.0, here is the > > >> link. > > >> > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/documentation.html > > >> > > >> Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered > > >> for v2.0 first? Are there any topics from previous releases you guys > > >> don't want to see anymore? > > >> > > >> Cheers! > > >> Hernan > > > > > > > >
