Hi  Peter

Deployment plans are version specific.If you are using geronimo1.0 you can't
deploy that with a V1.1 deployment plan.That's why it has been updated with
the version reason is the schema changes for each.I'm wondering why you are
not trying with latest geronimo version.
Thanks
Kanchana
On 9/28/07, PeterAU2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi. Please forgive my second newbie question!
>
> I'm also trying to get the Geronimo Hello world sample to work, from
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/deployment-plans-level-1.html
> Heading: Deploying JAR containing Simple EJB application
>
> I'm running Geronimo 1.0, but am thinking this example from 1.1 should
> work?
>
> When I attempt to deploy using the console, if I just enter the Archive
> file
> helloworld-ejbs.jar and no Plan I get the error:
> 'Currently a Geronimo deployment plan is required for an EJB
> module.  Please
> provide a plan as a deployer argument or packaged in the EJB JAR at
> META-INF/openejb-jar.xml'
> If I include the file META-INF\openejb-jar.xml (listed at bottom) then I
> get
> the same error.
>
>
> Please help.
>
> I'll update the wiki once I get this to work!
>
> Thanks again
>
>
> Peter
>
> <openejb-jar xmlns="http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/openejb-jar-2.1";>
>   <dep:environment
> xmlns:dep="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.1";>
>     <dep:moduleId>
>       <dep:groupId>org.geronimo.</dep:groupId>
>       <dep:artifactId>ejbsample</dep:artifactId>
>       <dep:version>1.0</dep:version>
>       <dep:type>car</dep:type>
>     </dep:moduleId>
>     <dep:dependencies/>
>     <dep:hidden-classes/>
>     <dep:non-overridable-classes/>
>   </dep:environment>
>   <enterprise-beans>
>     <session>
>       <ejb-name>HelloBean</ejb-name>
>       <jndi-name>org.geronimo.ejbsample.HomeBean</jndi-name>
>     </session>
>   </enterprise-beans>
> </openejb-jar>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Deployment-plan-required-tf4531791s134.html#a12932664
> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to