Hi Sebastian,
I read the article, it's very hard, at least for me, to implement the
pseudo-code algorithms of Effective Closeness and LineRank.
Do You Know any implementations in Apache Hadoop (MapReduce) or in Apache
Giraph?



2013/10/16 Silvio Di gregorio <silvio.digrego...@gmail.com>

> thank you very much Sebastian
>
>
> 2013/10/16 Sebastian Schelter <s...@apache.org>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you're interested in betweeness centrality, I suggest you have a look
>> at this paper [1] which proposes an algorithm called LineRank as
>> scalable substitute for betweeness centrality.
>>
>> Best,
>> Sebastian
>>
>> [1] http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ukang/papers/CentralitySDM2011.pdf
>>
>>
>> On 16.10.2013 08:44, Silvio Di gregorio wrote:
>> > I'm also trying to implement but with poor results. my target is the
>> > betweenness Centrality.
>> > The only thing that i did is generate giraph code throught Green-Marl,
>> but
>> > this is very far from being a running code.
>> > Update us if there are progress.
>> > But if complexity is quadratic in the of space it's hard to do.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/10/16 Jyoti Yadav <rao.jyoti26ya...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> Hi Silvio..
>> >> Thanks for your reply...
>> >>  Yes,  I want to realize All-source- shortest -path..Would you please
>> help
>> >> me out.?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Silvio Di gregorio <
>> >> silvio.digrego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Do you want realize all-source-shortest path?
>> >>> Il giorno 15/ott/2013 11:21, "Jyoti Yadav" <
>> rao.jyoti26ya...@gmail.com>
>> >>> ha scritto:
>> >>>
>> >>>  Hi..
>> >>>> If I want to run SingleSourceShortest Path example given in  Giraph
>> for
>> >>>> all the vertices ,then what changes I need to introduce and how ??
>> >>>> How master node will come to know that algorithm has successfully
>> >>>> completed for one vertex and it has to consider other vertex and
>> >>>> reinitialize the vertex values ..
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any ideas are really appreciated....
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Jyoti Yadav
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to