Is there any reason you actually *need* Giraph to run on YARN? If you don't get any benefit out of it -- just go with the default MR model.
Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Alessio Arleo <ingar...@icloud.com> wrote: > Thanks Roman for your reply :) in first place, I am pretty new to Giraph and > Hadoop. For what I could learn, Yarn is the result a of a complete overhaul > of MR, so I thought I could be wise to focus on the new technology: should I > rollback to Hadoop_2 profile instead of pure_yarn? Or am I just missing the > whole picture? > > Thanks :) > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 08 Dec 2014, at 23:59, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Dr. Alessio Arleo <ingar...@icloud.com> >>> wrote: >>> Hello everybody >>> >>> I managed to compile Giraph 1.1 for Hadoop 2.6.0 with pure_yarn maven >>> profile. I am running on a VM environment so I took the necessary actions as >>> listed in the Giraph Quick Start Guide. >> >> I think it would be fair to say that with Giraph on YARN you're running >> a configuration that hasn't been as much validated as Giraph on MR. >> Not to say you're on your own. More like: you're among a few users >> and collectively you guys may be on your own ;-) >> >> Patches, of course, are always welcome. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman.