Is there any reason you actually *need* Giraph to run on YARN?
If you don't get any benefit out of it -- just go with the default MR model.

Thanks,
Roman.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Alessio Arleo <ingar...@icloud.com> wrote:
> Thanks Roman for your reply :) in first place, I am pretty new to Giraph and 
> Hadoop. For what I could learn, Yarn is the result a of a complete overhaul 
> of MR, so I thought I could be wise to focus on the new technology: should I 
> rollback to Hadoop_2 profile instead of pure_yarn? Or am I just missing the 
> whole picture?
>
> Thanks :)
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 08 Dec 2014, at 23:59, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Dr. Alessio Arleo <ingar...@icloud.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Hello everybody
>>>
>>> I managed to compile Giraph 1.1 for Hadoop 2.6.0 with pure_yarn maven
>>> profile. I am running on a VM environment so I took the necessary actions as
>>> listed in the Giraph Quick Start Guide.
>>
>> I think it would be fair to say that with Giraph on YARN you're running
>> a configuration that hasn't been as much validated as Giraph on MR.
>> Not to say you're on your own. More like: you're among a few users
>> and collectively you guys may be on your own ;-)
>>
>> Patches, of course, are always welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.

Reply via email to