I’ll review right now. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message----- From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> Reply-To: "d...@gora.apache.org" <d...@gora.apache.org> Date: Monday, September 14, 2015 at 7:50 PM To: "<user@gora.apache.org>" <user@gora.apache.org>, "<d...@gora.apache.org>" <d...@gora.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1 RC#2 >Hi Folks, >Is anyone else able to review this new RC? It has been out for a week. >We currently have 2 VOTE's from Henry and myself which is not enough to >release the RC. >It would be very much appreciated if anyone who is in a position to review >can do so. >Thanks in advance. >Lewis > >On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> I am very happy to get a VOTE out for Apache Gora 0.6.1 Release >>Candidate >> #2. >> >> We solved 21 issues: http://s.apache.org/l69 >> >> Git source tag (79fba16dc9bf0b1660861a233a218bc669173178): >>*http://s.apache.org/gora-0.6.1 >> <http://s.apache.org/gora-0.6.1>* >> >> Staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegora-1003 >> >> Source Release Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6 - Lewis John McGibbney): http:// >> gora.apache.org/dist/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that >> contributed to Apache Gora 0.6.1. >> >> [ ] +1, let's get it released!!! >> [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... >> [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why >> >> >> P.S. Here is my +1 >> >> -- >> *Lewis* >> > > > >-- >*Lewis*
