On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:04 +0200, Hans Dockter wrote:
[ . . . ]
> We are still missing native implementations here (including unzip).  
> But this is planned. Have a look for our plans at the recent thread:  
> 'Improving our file operations support + archive  handling'

Cool.

I must have missed the discussion.

I have to admit, people's protocol on this list in dealing with replies
leads to horrendously large emails with (OK I exaggerate a bit) two
lines of reply 13 pages down a 20 page email.  I tend to delete these
without reading.  It would be far better if people didn't work on the
principle that you had to keep the entire history of the whole
"conversation" in each email, but instead assumed people keep the thread
and elide everything from the email that is not directly and immediately
pertinent to the response.  But then maybe I am the one out of sync?

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      Partner
                                            xmpp: [email protected]
Concertant LLP        t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
41 Buckmaster Road,   f: +44 8700 516 084   voip: sip:[email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK   m: +44 7770 465 077   skype: russel_winder

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to