Good feedback. Thanks!

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Joern Huxhorn <[email protected]>wrote:

> There are some issues that I'd really like to see fixed before 1.0 is
> released.
>
> The most important ones are all variations of the same general problem:
> GRADLE-1298 - Change in filtered resource not picked up by archive tasks
> GRADLE-1646 - Copy tasks do not consider filter/expansion properties in
> up-to-date checks
> GRADLE-1276 - processResources task considered up-to-date although its spec
> has changed
>
> I consider these quite crucial since they cause a certain distrust in the
> intelligence of the whole Gradle UP-TO-DATE detection - one of the biggest
> and most important Gradle feature.
> The 1.0 release will likely spark a broader adoption by people that care
> about a non-zero major version. I'd rather do an M6 and M7 than  release
> Gradle with this feature in a broken state.
>
> Also on my personal list - ordered by importance - are
> GRADLE-971  - fileMode not working for the copy task
> GRADLE-443  - Generated POM dependencies do not respect custom artifactIds
> GRADLE-1200 - Generated POM does not contain packaging, organization is
> simply org.apache.maven.model.Organization.toString()
>
> But those are much less critical, merely nice to have, in comparison to the
> one big problem above.
>
> Thanks for all of your hard work,
> Joern.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>


-- 
Szczepan Faber
Principal engineer@gradleware
Lead@mockito

Reply via email to