Hi Mike, Thanks for your help and for all the hard work invested in this project :)
I see the memory of guacd climb (not the main service, the child process created for the session). I also see out of memory message in the log. I looked at the code and found some places that look suspicious, but I'm not sure. For example, in guac_rdpdr_fs_process_write I see a call to guac_rdpdr_new_io_completion which creates a new stream and sends it over the virtual channel, but I don't see that the stream if freed. I tried to free the stream after svc_plugin_send but it caused the process to crash immediately, looks like svc_plugin_send is async, so in order to free it properly we need to use some FreeRDP callback. But I might be misinterpreting it and the stream is free somewhere else and that's not really the issue. I've tried to run valgrind but I can't get it to work. What do you think? Thanks, Gabriel On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 00:47, Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@glyptodon.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:36 AM gabriel sztejnworcel <gabriel....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are using Guacamole 1.0.0. >> >> When downloading large files using Guacamole's RDP drive redirection, at >> some point (after transferring around 3GB) the process reaches it's memory >> limit and stops. It happens also when transferring smaller files one after >> the other, it seems like the memory is not released even after the file >> transfer is completed. >> >> Has anyone encountered this issue? Is there an open bug for this? >> > > There is one issue affecting 1.0.0 and older which would prevent > successful transfer of files once ~4 GB is reached. This is due to > incorrect usage of a 32-bit value to represent file seek offsets: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-764 > > There are no known issues with file transfer, fixed or otherwise, which > would result in server memory usage increasing until some process limit is > reached. Are you seeing the actual memory usage of the guacd process climb? > Or are you just seeing transfer appear to stop? > > - Mike > >
