Why is it that when anyone asks a question about IBM Tom wants to take it off line?
Not very social. I personally find it interesting that IBM requires that their products are tied to IBM's JVM. I also wonder about the cost of running Hadoop on the mainframe. (Linux LPARs while cheaper, still cost mips. ) [Forgive me, its been a while since I spoke mainframe] So what's the real advantage from an architecture point of view? On Sep 19, 2012, at 6:39 PM, Tom Deutsch <tdeut...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Serge - let's take this off list. Ping me directly and we'll take it from > there. > > --------------------------------------- > Sent from my Blackberry so please excuse typing and spelling errors. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Serge Blazhiyevskyy [serge.blazhiyevs...@nice.com] > Sent: 09/19/2012 03:16 PM CST > To: "user@hadoop.apache.org" <user@hadoop.apache.org> > Subject: IBM big insights distribution > > > > Hi all, > > Anybody had a success compiling Map reduce jobs with big insights distro on > MAC? > > Seems like it requires IBM java JDK and it might not be available on MAC. > > Is there a way work around it? > > > Thanks > Serge > > > >
