Manish,

you stop HDFS then start HDFS on the standby name node right?

please looked at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5058

there are two solutions:
1) start HDFS on the active name node, nor SBN
2) copy {namenode.name.dir}/* to the SBN

I advice #1.




On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Manish Bhoge <manishbh...@rocketmail.com>wrote:

> I have all configuration fine. But whenever i start namenode it fails with
> a below exception. No clue where to fix this?
>
> "2013-08-07 02:56:22,754 FATAL
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Exception in namenode join"
>
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,751 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage: 
> Number of files = 1
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,751 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage: 
> Number of files under construction = 0
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,752 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage: 
> Image file of size 115 loaded in 0 seconds.
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,752 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage: 
> Loaded image for txid 0 from 
> /data/1/dfs/nn/current/fsimage_0000000000000000000
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,752 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage: 
> Reading 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.RedundantEditLogInputStream@5f18223d 
> expecting start txid #1
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,752 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.EditLogInputStream: Fast-forwarding 
> stream '/data/1/dfs/nn/current/edits_0000000000000515247-0000000000000515255' 
> to transaction ID 1
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,753 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.MetricsSystemImpl: Stopping NameNode metrics 
> system...
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,754 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.MetricsSystemImpl: NameNode metrics system 
> stopped.
> 2013-08-07 02:56:22,754 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.MetricsSystemImpl: NameNode metrics system 
> shutdown complete.2013-08-07 02:56:22,754 FATAL 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Exception in namenode join
> java.io.IOException: There appears to be a gap in the edit log.  We expected 
> txid 1, but got txid 515247.
>
>

Reply via email to