Yes, it does take those extra resources away back to queue B. How quickly it takes them away depends on whether preemption is enabled or not. If preemption is not enabled, it 'takes away' as and when containers from queue A start finishing.
+Binod On Feb 19, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Alex Nastetsky <anastet...@spryinc.com> wrote: > Will the scheduler take away the 10% from queue B and give it back to queue A > even if queue B needs it? If not, it would seem that the scheduler is > reneging on its guarantee. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
