what kind of jobs your tasks will be doing?
are they CPU intensive or only memory intensive ?


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Sindhu Hosamane <sindh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello ,
>
> If i am running my experiment on a server with 2 processors (4 cores each
> ) .
> To say it has 2 processors and 8 cores .
> What would be the ideal values for mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum
>  and mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum to get maximum performance.
> Your help is very much appreciated.
>
>
> Regards,
> Sindhu
>
>
> On 29 Jul 2014, at 18:56, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > It isn't the DataNode that does the compute spawn/work, but the
> TaskTracker.
> >
> > If you wanted to increase MR parallelism on a single machine, you do
> > not need two DNs, nor two TTs, just higher slot capacities in your
> > TT's mapred-site.xml via properties
> > mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum and
> > mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:30 PM, sindhu hosamane <sindh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hello ,
> >>
> >> i set up 2 datanodes on a single machine(ubuntu machine)  accordingly
> >> mentioned in the thread
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-user/201009.mbox/%3ca3ef3f6af24e204b812d1d24ccc8d71a03688...@mse16be2.mse16.exchange.ms%3E
> >>
> >> Ubuntu machine has 2 processors and 8 cores. Assuming that machine is
> >> powerful , i Setup 2 datanodes on that same machine.
> >>
> >> Now when i run jps on that multinode hadoop , i get
> >> Namenode
> >> Datanode
> >> Datanode
> >> Jobtracker
> >> Tasktracker
> >> Secondary Namenode
> >>
> >> The above result Shows 2 datanodes are up and running
> >>
> >> Also i have a single node on that ubuntu machine as well.
> >> Now when i check Performance on singlenode and multinode , both are
> almost
> >> same.So now ,
> >> How do i make sure load is being distributed on both datanodes or each
> >> datanode uses different cores of the ubuntu machine.
> >>
> >> (Note: i know multiple datanodes on same machine is not that
> advantageous ,
> >> but assuming my machine is powerful ..i set it up..)
> >>
> >> would appreciate any advices on this.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Sindhu
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Harsh J
>
>


-- 
Nitin Pawar

Reply via email to