I bet you are not setting different Resource-Request-priorities on your 
requests.

It is a current limitation (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-314) of 
not being able to support resources of different sizes against a single 
priority.

+Vinod

On Nov 3, 2014, at 1:23 AM, Smita Deshpande 
<smita.deshpa...@cumulus-systems.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I have a single YARN application running on a cluster of 1 master 
> node(Resourcemanager) and 3 slave nodes (Nodemanagers) - total memory= 24GB, 
> total vcores= 12. I am using Hadoop 2.4.1 and scheduler is Capacity-Scheduler 
> with DominantResourceCalculator. This application submits 10 container 
> requests to ResourceManager through the asynchronous AMRM client ( 
> AMRMClientAsync). The behavior I observed was that the container request 
> asking for the most resources gets allocated first. For eg. 9 requests are 
> for 2GB containers and 1 request is for a 4 GB container, then the 4GB 
> container gets allocated and here's where it runs into a problem - It just 
> stops there - it doesn't allocate any containers for all the 2 GB requests!
> Once a container is allocated my app runs a task on it and once it is 
> finished , app submits a fresh container request for this task (the tasks are 
> of a repeating nature). Then again the RM allocates a 4GB container for this 
> request, completely ignoring all the requests in between. I don't know if it 
> is an issue with the AMRMClientAsync class- I haven't tried using the normal 
> AMRMclient yet. Now I have tasks that require 2 GB and tasks that require 4 
> GB memory. Because of this problem it is only running the 4 GB task again and 
> again.
> If all the container requests are identical in terms of resources, then this 
> problem disappears and RM allocates all requested containers.
> 
> Couldn't find any documentation/known bugs relating to this. I've hit a brick 
> wall here, any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance
> 
> -SMita

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to