That looks indeed like a leak. The problem is that this could be anywhere, even in your user code. Will brew something together to reproduce this...
2013/2/20 Francisco Sanches <[email protected]> > Hi Thomas, > > I observed this by measuring the amount of memory consumed in each > superstep. I create all the vectors of the superstep distance 0, this > superstep has a jump in memory usage. The Problem is that the use not > stabilizes, memory consumption always increases. I think it's messages, > because in eclipse I run on a only computer I can run a graph with 10,000 > vertices in a cluster with 15 machines can not run a graph of 40 000 > vertices. > > > 2013/2/20 Thomas Jungblut <[email protected]> > > > > > > > From what I could see all the messages that are sent remain in > > > memory even if the superstep taking over. > > > > > > > How did you measure this? Can you boil it down to a structure that holds > > that messages? Have you profiled it? > > > > > > -- > Francisco Sanches >
